首页> 外文会议>International Astronautical Congress >COMING TO AN AGREEMENT WITHIN UNCOPUOS - CONSENSUS DECISION MAKING REVISITED
【24h】

COMING TO AN AGREEMENT WITHIN UNCOPUOS - CONSENSUS DECISION MAKING REVISITED

机译:在未经宣布的协议中达成协议 - 重新访问共识决定

获取原文

摘要

In the year of the 50th anniversary of the Outer Space Treaty (OST) it is time for a review of how international cooperation in developing international legal norms works in the context of the peaceful uses of outer space. Recent discussions on how to assure the long-term sustainability of outer space activities show the intrinsic need for international cooperation in this field. In this respect the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) has served as one of the backbones of such cooperation throughout its history, while its decision making process was a central mechanism. COPUOS has been one of the first committees within the UN General Assembly system to use consensus as its official decision making rule. This paper examines the consensus decision making process in respect to a) whether the decision making process is influenced by factors which are said to be favorable for consensus decision making in literature or not, and b) the historical development of consensus decision making within COPUOS. For a) a refined version of the "Discourse Quality Index" is used that identifies which actors play/played an important and/or leading role in coming to a consensus by using three indicators: Status and reputation of representatives within the Committee, leadership, and constructive politics. This empirical study analyses the development of five decisions that span over the more than 50 years of the Committee's existence: the 1967 OST, the 1979 Moon Agreement, the 1986 Remote Sensing Principles, the 1992 Principles on the Use of Nuclear Power Sources and the 2007 Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines. It draws on primary data from the lists of representatives of COPUOS' Sub-Committees, the Summary Records and the various working papers submitted by different countries during the decision making process. The findings of this study a) do not the support statements in existing literature on deliberative processes when it comes to factors that favo
机译:在外层空间条约(OST)50周年的今年是时候在发展国际法律规范的国际合作如何在外层空间和平利用的情况下工作的审查。如何确保外层空间活动的长期可持续性最近的讨论表明在这一领域的国际合作的内在需要。在这方面,联合国外层空间委员会和平利用(COPUOS)曾担任在其整个历史中,这种合作的支柱之一,而其决策过程是一个中央机制。外空委一直是联合国大会系统作为其官方决策规则中使用的共识中的第一委员会之一。本文考察了共识决策过程中相对于a)所述决策过程是否是由被认为是对共识决策在文献或没有,和b)一致决定内COPUOS制作的历史发展有利因素的影响。对于一)“话语质量指数”的细化版本用于标识哪个演员扮演/发挥了重要的和/或通过使用三个指标导致在未来达成共识的角色:状态和委员会中代表的声誉,领导,和建设性的政治。此实证研究分析了五项决定发展跨度超过50年以上的委员会的存在:1967年OST,1979年月球协定,1986年的遥感原则,在1992年使用核动力源和2007年原则空间碎片减缓指南。它借鉴了外空委“小组委员会,简要记录,并在决策过程中提出不同国家的各种工作文件的代表名单主要数据。本研究中的)的结果并不在议事过程现有文献的支持声明,当涉及到FAVO因素

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号