首页> 外文会议>Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology >1x stencil masks fabrication and their use in Low-Energy Electron-beam Proximity Lithography (LEEPL)
【24h】

1x stencil masks fabrication and their use in Low-Energy Electron-beam Proximity Lithography (LEEPL)

机译:1X模板面罩制造及其在低能量电子束接近光刻(LEEPL)中的使用

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Thirty years ago it was the common believe of most of the lithographer that the limit end for the optical lithography will be at about 1 μm ground rule. So NGL tools were developed to go in the 500nm and 250nm regions. 15 years later the different optical lithography techniques were still alive exposing feature sizes down to 200nm and the NGL tool developer had to move to 100nm and below. Today 100nm features made by optical lithography is world wide a common technique in most of the modern chip manufacturing plants, and feature sizes beyond the used wavelength are state of art. So do we really need NGL or will the optical lithography lives forever? Well, there are already optical system available or will be soon delivered to the manufacturing lines which are able to expose feature sizes down to 70nm and even to 50nm if they use 193nm immersion lithography. But for what price? The optical lithography became extremely expensive. Reticles for the 70nm technology full with OPC structures may cost up to
机译:三十年前,这是常见的大多数衣架,光学光刻的极限结束将在约1μm的地面规则。因此,NGL工具是开发的500nm和250nm的地区。 15年后,不同的光学光刻技术仍然活着暴露于200nm的特征尺寸,并且NGL工具开发剂必须移动到100nm和以下。如今,光学光刻制造的100nm特征是世界范围的一种在大多数现代芯片制造工厂中的常用技术,并且超出了超出了二手波长的特征尺寸是艺术状态。所以我们真的需要ngl还是将永远存在光学光刻?嗯,已经有光学系统可用,或者将很快送到能够将特征尺寸暴露至70nm甚至50nm的制造线路,如果它们使用193nm浸入式光刻。但是价格是多少?光学光刻变得非常昂贵。拥有OPC结构的70nm技术的标题可能会花费

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号