首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship >Cost Reduction First or Innovation First? Latecomer Firms’ Technology Catching-up Strategy Selection
【24h】

Cost Reduction First or Innovation First? Latecomer Firms’ Technology Catching-up Strategy Selection

机译:成本减少第一或创新首先? LateComer公司的技术追赶战略选择

获取原文

摘要

Based on the composition-based view (CBV), this paper studies the effect of cost-oriented and innovation-oriented catching-up strategies on the performance of latecomer firms by taking 249 A-share listed firms in the communication and electronic equipment manufacturing industry as samples. In addition, the paper examines the moderating effect of the technological knowledge stock on the relationship between the choice of catching-up strategy and the performance of latecomer firms. The study has found that the more the latecomer firms focus on reducing costs, the higher the performance; the more the latecomer firms emphasize innovation, the lower the performance. In addition, the high technological knowledge stock of latecomer firms can weaken the positive relationship between the cost-oriented strategy and the firm performance, but it has no effect on the negative relationship between the innovation-oriented strategy and the firm performance. The research results have a certain reference value for the selection of catching-up strategies of latecomer firms.
机译:根据基于组成视图(CBV),本文研究的使用成本为导向,以249家A股上市公司在通信和电子设备制造业赶超的后发企业的绩效战略创新为本作为样品。此外,本文探讨了技术知识股对追赶战略选择与拉伸公司的表现之间关系的调节效果。该研究发现,越来越多的拉森伯公司专注于降低成本,性能越高;拉伸公司强调创新越多,性能越低。此外,后期企业的高科技知识库存可以削弱成本导向的战略与公司性能之间的积极关系,但它对创新策略与企业绩效之间的负面关系没有影响。研究结果具有一定的参考价值,以选择拉伸议员的追赶策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号