首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping conference >COMMENTARY ON RECENT CHANGES IN ASME B31.3 POST WELD HEAT TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF WELD PREHEAT
【24h】

COMMENTARY ON RECENT CHANGES IN ASME B31.3 POST WELD HEAT TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF WELD PREHEAT

机译:关于ASME B31.3焊后热处理要求的最新变化和焊前效果的评论

获取原文

摘要

The 2014 Edition of ASME B31.3, Process Piping [1], introduced significant changes to the post weld heat treatment (PWHT) requirements for P-No. 1 carbon steel materials. In particular, PWHT is no longer a mandatory requirement for any wall thickness provided that multi-pass welding is employed for wall thicknesses greater than 5 mm (3/16 of an inch) and a minimum preheat of 95°C (200°F) is implemented for wall thicknesses greater than 25 mm (1 inch). Detailed fracture mechanics analyses have shown that the lack of a mandatory PWHT requirement for thicker P-No. 1 components may result in a significant increase in risk for brittle fracture failures due to near-yield level weld residual stresses. Given the concern throughout the pressure vessel and piping community regarding potential brittle fracture failures, this updated PWHT guidance is examined. Impact testing requirements and exemption curves were introduced in the 1987 Addenda [2] of ASME Section VIII Division 1 (VIII-1) [3] in Paragraph UCS-66 and extended into ASME Section VIII Division 2 (VIII-2) [4]. During the VIII-2 rewrite in 2007 [5], the available technical and historical basis for the UCS-66 exemption curves was examined and improved to reflect modern fracture mechanics standards. The result of that effort was a systematic approach that can be modified for particular geometries and assumed flaws, if desired. The method used the most modern, fracture mechanics approach for welds in API 579-1/ASME FFS-1, Fitness-For-Service, (API 579) [6] based on the failure assessment diagram (FAD). As a result of explicitly accounting for weld residual stress, two separate sets of exemption curves are provided in VIII-2 [4]; one set for as-welded components and another set for PWHT components. In this paper, a similar approach is summarized to generate exemption curves by establishing newer as-welded and PWHT curves using the Fracture Toughness Master Curve (Master Curve) as documented in upcoming Welding Research Council (WRC) Bulletin 562 [7]. The increased propensity for brittle fracture in as-welded components versus PWHT components is clearly highlighted using this approach. The Master Curve, in conjunction with the elastic-plastic fracture mechanics employed in API 579 [6] provides a means to develop exemptions curves anchored in state-of-the-art fracture toughness technology that can be directly tied to different reference flaw sizes. Additionally, commentary on the appropriateness of the current ASME B31.3 [1] PWHT requirements is offered and the effectiveness of using weld preheat in lieu of PWHT as permitted in the National Board Inspection Code (NBIC) [8] is examined using simplified computational weld analysis.
机译:2014年版ASME B31.3,Process Piping [1],对P-NO的焊接焊接热处理(PWHT)要求引入了显着的变化。 1碳钢材料。特别地,如果使用大于5mm(3/16英寸)的壁厚和95°C(200°F)的最小预热,则PWHT不再用于任何壁厚度的强制性要求。用于大于25mm(1英寸)的壁厚实现。详细的骨折力学分析表明,缺乏强制性的p-no强制性的p-now。由于近屈服水平焊接残余应力,1个组分可能导致脆性断裂失效风险显着增加。鉴于整个压力容器和管道界的担忧,关于潜在的脆性断裂失败,检查了这种更新的PWHT指导。 1987年ASME第VIII段第1(VIII-1)[3]中的1987年ADDENDA [2]在段段-66中延伸到ASME第VIII段2(VIII-2)[4]中引入了影响测试要求和豁免曲线。在2007年的VIII-2重写期间,检查了UCS-66豁免曲线的可用技术和历史基础,并改善以反映现代骨折力学标准。该努力的结果是一种系统方法,可以在需要的情况下修改特定几何形状,并假设缺陷(如果需要)。该方法采用了API 579-1 / ASME-1,适用性服务的焊缝最现代,骨折方法,(API 579)[6]基于故障评估图(FAD)。由于明确核对焊接残余应力,VIII-2 [4]中提供了两组独立的豁免曲线;用于适用于焊接部件的一组,另一种用于PWHT部件。在本文中,总结了一种类似的方法来通过在即将到来的焊接研究委员会(WRC)公告562 [7]中以文档建立更新的韧性和曲线)来产生豁免曲线。使用这种方法清楚地突出显示,在焊接成分中的脆性骨折的增加倾向增加。与API 579中使用的弹性塑料断裂力学结合使用的主曲线提供了一种开发锚固状态的尾部曲线的手段,该抗骨折技术可以直接与不同的参考缺陷尺寸直接相关。此外,通过简化的计算,提供了对当前ASME B31.3 [1] PWWHT要求的拟合要求的适当性的评论,并且使用焊接预热代替PWHT的焊接预热[8]的有效性焊接分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号