首页> 外文会议>IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference >An analysis of consistency in, and between, ontology, epistemology and philosophical perspective as contained studies of the first year experience
【24h】

An analysis of consistency in, and between, ontology, epistemology and philosophical perspective as contained studies of the first year experience

机译:对第一年经验的研究,本体学,认识论与哲学视角的一致性分析

获取原文

摘要

Recurring themes in the literature on students' experiences of their first year in college education include performance and retention, socialisation, learning and teaching methods, interaction with staff and the student's history prior to college. Methods used to collect and analyse data vary considerably and reflect differences among researchers in the philosophical positions underpinning these projects. In this paper, we analyse two studies of the first year experience (FYE) that reflect the variation in ontology, i.e. what can be known about the FYE as manifest in the questions asked, and also epistemology, i.e. how we can learn about it as manifest in the methods used. The ways in which studies are conducted and data are collected and analysed are used to categorise the philosophy driving these research projects. We describe a study carried out from the positivist perspective and highlight the difficulty these researchers have in maintaining this perspective when reporting their findings. We analyse the objectivity that is claimed to exist in such research. Phenomenology, in contrast, has very different underlying assumptions about what can be known about student learning and development and studies in this camp deliberately avoid the hypothesis testing that characterises the former. An example of how this qualitative method has been employed in studying approaches to learning is provided along with the types of findings that emerge from this work. While positivism seeks to explain and model, phenomenology only aims to describe yet both camps seek to obtain some sense of truth. While phenomenologists claim to have truth but lack certainty in a generalisable sense, the positivists are certain but do they really know the truth? What can we learn from these two approaches? We contrast the findings that emerge from both methods and discuss the relevance and importance these have for the issue at hand - improving the first year experience in a real way.
机译:学生在大学教育中的第一年学生的经验中的重复主题包括绩效和保留,社会化,学习和教学方法,与工作人员的互动以及学生在大学之前的历史。用于收集和分析数据的方法显着变化,反映了基于这些项目的哲学职位的研究人员之间的差异。在本文中,我们分析了对反映本体论变异的第一年经验的两项研究,即在提出的问题中可以作为清单所知,以及认识论,即我们如何学习它在使用的方法中清单。研究和分析研究和数据的方式用于对驾驶这些研究项目的哲学进行分类。我们描述了一项从实证主义的角度进行的研究,并突出这些研究人员在报告其发现时难以保持这种观点的困难。我们分析了这些研究中所存在的客观性。相比之下,现象学对学生学习和开发以及本营地的研究故意避免特征前者的假设检测,对学生的学习和开发和研究具有很大的潜在的假设。如何在学习学习方法中使用这种定性方法的一个例子,以及从这作品中出现的结果。虽然实证主义寻求解释和模仿,但现象学只旨在描述两个营地都试图获得一些真理感。虽然现象科学家声称具有真理但在普遍的意义上缺乏确定性,但实证主义者肯定但他们真的知道真相吗?我们可以从这两种方法中学到什么?我们对两种方法产生的调查结果进行了鲜明,并讨论了这些问题的相关性和重要性,这些问题在手中的问题 - 以真正的方式改善第一年的经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号