首页> 外文会议>ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition;IMECE2011 >EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SHELL SIDE HEAT TRANSFER PERFORMANCE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL OVERLAP TRISECTION HELICAL BAFFLE HEAT EXCHANGERS
【24h】

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SHELL SIDE HEAT TRANSFER PERFORMANCE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL OVERLAP TRISECTION HELICAL BAFFLE HEAT EXCHANGERS

机译:环行重叠螺旋折流板换热器壳侧换热性能的实验研究

获取原文

摘要

A set of experiments were conducted on the circumferential overlap Bisection helical baffle heat exchangers with inclined angles of 20°, 24°, 28° and 32° single-thread and inclined angle of 32° dual-thread one, and a segmental baffle heat exchanger as a contrast scheme. The cylinder case of the testing heat exchanger is a common shell, while the tube bundle core could be replaced. The shell side heat transfer coefficient h_o is obtained by subtract tube-side convection thermal resistance and tube wall conduction resistance from the overall heat transfer coefficient K. The curves of shell side heat transfer coefficient h_o, pressure drop Ap_o, Nusselt number Mi_o, and axial Euler number Eu_(z,o) are presented versus axial Reynolds number Re_(z,o) A comprehensive performance index Nu_o/Eu_(z,o) is suggested to demonstrate the integral properties of both heat transfer and flow resistance of different schemes, and the curves of Nu_o/Eu_(z,o) versus Re_(z,o) of the different schemes are presented. The results show that the scheme with inclined angle 20° performs better than other schemes, and the scheme with inclined angle 24° ranks the second, however the segment scheme ranks the last. The curves of Nu_o/Eu_(z,o) of both schemes with inclined angle 32° of single-thread and dual-thread are almost coincident, even though their heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop curves are quite different. The results indicate also that for the circumferential overlap trisection helical baffle schemes the optimal inclined angle is around 20° instead of around 40° as rated by many literatures for the quadrant helical baffle schemes.
机译:对具有20°,24°,28°和32°单螺纹斜角和32°双螺纹斜角的圆周重叠Bisection螺旋折流板换热器以及分段折流板换热器进行了一组实验作为对比方案。测试热交换器的气缸壳是普通壳体,而管束芯可以更换。壳侧传热系数h_o是通过从总传热系数K中减去管侧对流热阻和管壁导热系数而得出的。壳侧传热系数h_o,压降Ap_o,努塞尔数Mi_o和轴向的曲线给出了欧拉数Eu_(z,o)与轴向雷诺数Re_(z,o)的综合性能指标Nu_o / Eu_(z,o),以证明不同方案的传热和流阻的整体特性,给出了不同方案的Nu_o / Eu_(z,o)相对于Re_(z,o)的曲线。结果表明,倾斜角度为20°的方案比其他方案表现更好,倾斜角度为24°的方案排名第二,而分段方案则排名最后。两种方案的单螺纹和双螺纹倾斜角均为32°时,Nu_o / Eu_(z,o)的曲线几乎重合,即使它们的传热系数和压降曲线相差很大。结果还表明,对于周向重叠的三等分螺旋折流板方案,最佳倾斜角约为20°,而不是象限螺旋折流方案的许多文献所估计的约40°。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号