首页> 外文会议>Association of State Dam Safety Officials annual conference >HYATT DAM - CHALLENGES OF MODIFYING A 96-YEAR-OLD EMBANKMENT DAM TO ADDRESS INTERNAL EROSION RISK
【24h】

HYATT DAM - CHALLENGES OF MODIFYING A 96-YEAR-OLD EMBANKMENT DAM TO ADDRESS INTERNAL EROSION RISK

机译:凯悦大坝 - 修改96岁的堤坝大坝以解决内部侵蚀风险的挑战

获取原文

摘要

Hyatt Dam, a 96-year old dam in Reclamation's inventory, is a classic example of episodic internal erosion during normal operating conditions occurring over time. The homogeneous earthfill dam and its appurtenant structures were constructed in 1922-1923 by the Talent Irrigation District, and transferred to Reclamation in the 1950s. Excessive seepage, principally located on the left side of the dam, was first observed in the mid-1970s, and those initial observations indicated that seepage flows were clear. However, several instances from 1987-2009 indicate that episodic internal erosion was taking place in the vicinity of the downstream toe of the embankment. In 1987, a milky plume appeared in one of the seepage monitoring weirs and in 2000, large quantities of turbid water flowed out of the toe drain pipe during investigative excavations of the toe drain. A drop in toe drain flows in 2009 suggested that the toe drain was plugged, unable to collect and convey seepage from the embankment and foundation. Also in 2009, new point sources of seepage were observed at the downstream toe of the dam and existing seepage areas appeared to have worsened. Field investigations, engineering analyses and subsequent risk analyses indicated that without modification, Hyatt Dam would continue to experience episodic internal erosion, which could progress to dam failure. The estimated high risks for internal erosion of the embankment and foundation overburden materials were driven by unfiltered seepage exiting at the downstream toe of the embankment with sufficient velocity to initiate internal erosion of embankment or foundation materials, and the underlying fractured basalt foundation that was not treated during original construction. Designs were developed in 2016 to modify the dam to lower the risk of an internal erosion failure, and the modifications were completed in 2017. Upon exposure of the basalt foundation, the rock surface was found to vary significantly from what was anticipated during preparation of the modification designs. The undulating nature of the bedrock and existence of steep bedrock offsets and overhangs necessitated implementing design changes during construction to treat the foundation, adjust the new toe drain system alignment to match the existing bedrock surface, and modify filter material placement to address wet areas exposed on the downstream face of the excavated embankment.
机译:一个96岁的雷汉库存中的凯悦大坝是在正常运行条件下发生的巨大内部侵蚀的经典例子。由天才灌溉区1922年至1923年构建了均匀的土泥浆及其附属结构,并在20世纪50年代转入填海道。过多的渗漏,主要位于大坝的左侧,于20世纪70年代中期首次观察到,那些初步观察表明渗流流动清晰。然而,来自1987 - 2009年的几个实例表明,在堤防下游脚趾附近发生了情节内部侵蚀。 1987年,乳白色羽毛出现在其中一个渗漏监测堰和2000年,在脚趾排水的调查挖掘过程中,大量的浑浊流出脚趾排水管。 2009年的脚趾排水流动表明,插入了脚趾排水,无法收集并从堤防和基础传达渗漏。同样在2009年,在大坝的下游脚趾观察到渗流的新点来源,似乎似乎恶化了。现场调查,工程分析和随后的风险分析表明,没有修改,凯悦大坝将继续体验集体内部侵蚀,这可能取得坝体失败。估计的堤防和基础覆盖物材料的内部侵蚀的高风险是由在堤防下游脚趾的未过滤渗流引发,具有足够的速度,以引发堤防或基础材料的内部侵蚀,以及未治疗的底层裂缝玄武岩基础在原始建筑期间。 2016年开发了设计,修改大坝以降低内部侵蚀失效的风险,并在2017年完成修改。在暴露玄武岩基础后,发现岩石表面与准备期间预期的内容有显着变化修改设计。陡峭的基岩偏移和突出端的基岩和存在的起伏性质必要施工期间,在执行设计变更处理的基础上,调整新趾排水系统对准以匹配现有基岩表面,并修改过滤材料放置到地址暴露在潮湿的地方挖掘堤防的下游面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号