首页> 外文会议>IPC apex expo technical conference 2010 >Round Robin Testing in Support of IPC J-STD-709: Combustion Sample Preparation Methods for Ion Chromatography Analysis of Br and Cl
【24h】

Round Robin Testing in Support of IPC J-STD-709: Combustion Sample Preparation Methods for Ion Chromatography Analysis of Br and Cl

机译:支持IPC J-STD-709的循环测试:溴和氯离子色谱分析的燃烧样品制备方法

获取原文

摘要

This paper will present the results of a round robin study of sample combustion followed by ion chromatography (CIC) to measure the concentration of bromine and chlorine in electronic materials. The study involved ten volunteer testing labs, each analyzing four donated polymeric samples. Its primary objective was to gauge the within-lab and lab-to-lab reproducibility of the IC results obtained using the oxygen bomb and furnace sample combustion methods. The accuracy of sample combustion method was also investigated. Statistical analysis shows the within-lab reproducibility was better for the furnace method while the lab-to-lab reproducibility was better for the oxygen bomb method. In addition, both methods showed good agreement in the results of samples with concentrations around the 1000 ppm threshold. However, neither method proved accurate for very high concentrations of bromine and chlorine. These findings led to a group of recommendation for the analysis of Br and Cl using CIC.
机译:本文将介绍对样品燃烧进行循环研究的结果,然后进行离子色谱法(CIC)来测量电子材料中的溴和氯浓度。该研究涉及十个志愿者测试实验室,每个实验室分析了四个捐赠的聚合物样品。其主要目的是评估使用氧弹和炉子样品燃烧方法获得的IC结果在实验室内和实验室之间的可重复性。还研究了样品燃烧方法的准确性。统计分析表明,炉内方法的实验室内部可重复性更好,而氧弹法则实验室之间的可重复性更好。此外,两种方法在浓度约为1000 ppm阈值的样品中均显示出良好的一致性。但是,两种方法都无法证明对于非常高浓度的溴和氯而言是准确的。这些发现为使用CIC分析Br和Cl提出了一组建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号