首页> 外文会议>ASME turbo expo >QUASI-THREE DIMENSIONAL VERIFICATION OF THE MODULAR AXIAL COMPRESSOR DESIGN APPROACH
【24h】

QUASI-THREE DIMENSIONAL VERIFICATION OF THE MODULAR AXIAL COMPRESSOR DESIGN APPROACH

机译:模块化轴流压气机设计方法的准三维验证

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In an article published some time ago, the authors investigated the idea of breaking down the [multi-stage] compressor component of the typical turbofan engine into modules. The motivation for this work stems from a "Lean Engineering" approach to gas turbine engine design. Five (5) modules were created; they are the inlet, front, core, rear, and exit modules. The intent is to maximize the size of the core module, as represented by the number of stages. Thus, many different compressors can share the core module, which will greatly reduce the Lifecycle costs for the fleet. The next stage of this work focuses on the Meanline and Throughflow design and analysis of two different compressors that share an 8-stage core. The first compressor, HPC-1, is a 10-stage compressor operating at 9,000 rpm, having 100 Kg/sec inlet mass flow rate, and a 13.5:1 overall pressure ratio. HPC-2 is a 13-stage modular upgrade of HPC-1, operating at 9,700 rpm, having an inlet mass flow rate of 140 Kg/sec, and a 27:1 overall pressure ratio. Applying the modular concept, the first and last stages (of HPC-1) have been removed and replaced by 2 and 3 stages, respectively. Additionally the inlet and exit modules have been redesigned as well. Preliminary Meanline analysis showed that this concept could present challenging boundary conditions for the design of the interface stage; the name assigned to the first stage of the core module. The conditions entering that stage represent a critical hurdle to the viability of this method. Slight variations in corrected speed and pressure ratios for stages 1 and 2 of the modular upgrade, HPC-2, provided the necessary realignment of the core module. The pressure ratio of the core module differs by less than 1% for both compressors. And in both instances, the corrected speed is virtually identical. Throughflow analysis, conducted using T-AXI, confirms the redesign and the viability of the method.
机译:在一段时间前发表的一篇文章中,作者研究了将典型涡轮风扇发动机的[多级]压缩机组件分解为模块的想法。这项工作的动机源于燃气轮机发动机设计的“精益工程”方法。创建了五(5)个模块;它们是进口,前,核心,后和出口模块。目的是使核心模块的大小最大化,如阶段数所示。因此,许多不同的压缩机可以共享核心模块,这将大大降低车队的生命周期成本。这项工作的下一个阶段着重于均值和通流设计以及对共享一个8级核心的两个不同压缩机的分析。第一台压缩机HPC-1是10级压缩机,以9,000 rpm的转速运行,入口质量流量为100 Kg / sec,总压力比为13.5:1。 HPC-2是HPC-1的13阶段模块化升级,以9,700 rpm的速度运行,入口质量流量为140 Kg / sec,总压力比为27:1。应用模块化概念,已删除(HPC-1的)第一阶段和最后阶段,分别由2和3阶段代替。此外,入口和出口模块也已重新设计。初步的平均线分析表明,该概念可能为界面阶段的设计提出具有挑战性的边界条件。分配给核心模块第一阶段的名称。进入该阶段的条件是该方法可行性的关键障碍。对于模块化升级HPC-2的第1阶段和第2阶段,校正后的速度和压力比的微小变化提供了核心模块的必要重新对准。对于两种压缩机,核心模块的压力比相差不到1%。在这两种情况下,校正后的速度实际上是相同的。使用T-AXI进行的通流分析证实了该方法的重新设计和可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号