首页> 外文会议>National meeting of the American Chemical Society >Chapter 2 Using Two-Day Food Consumption Survey Data for Longitudinal Dietary Exposure Analyses
【24h】

Chapter 2 Using Two-Day Food Consumption Survey Data for Longitudinal Dietary Exposure Analyses

机译:第2章使用两天食品消费调查数据进行纵向膳食暴露分析

获取原文

摘要

There is no entirely suitable substitute for a robust data base with daily food consumption diaries for thousands of individuals maintained over many weeks, months, and years. In fact, we have little more than two-day food intake records for about 20,000 individuals from the CSFII. But this short-term food consumption data can be used to simulate longer-term consumption trends for many commonly eaten foods. The two simulation methods examined in this paper are complimentary, and neither alone has the ability to predict the entire distribution of food consumption frequencies. At the high end of the frequency distribution (i.e., generally above the 95th percentile), the two-day record repeat method better simulates the directly measured consumption frequencies reported in the NHANES survey. The cohort record sharing method, performed poorly at the high end of the food consumption distribution. However, in the mid-range of the food consumption distribution (generally between the 40th and 70th percentiles) the cohort record sharing method provided more reliable estimates of food consumption frequencies relative to the two-day repeat method. Between the 70th and 95th percentiles, the actual frequencies of food consumption, and by extension the most realistic expectation for exposure values, are most likely bounded by the two estimates provided by these two simulation methods. Therefore, both of these approaches are useful. The risk assessor must select the most appropriate method for the intended purpose.
机译:对于拥有数周,数月和数年维护的数千个人的日常食品消费日记,没有完全合适的替代品来替代强大的数据库。实际上,我们从CSFII获得的大约20,000人的食物摄取记录只有两天。但是,该短期食物消费数据可用于模拟许多常见食用食物的长期消费趋势。本文研究的两种模拟方法是互补的,并且没有一个能够预测食物消耗频率的整体分布。在频率分布的高端(即通常高于第95个百分位数),为期两天的记录重复方法可以更好地模拟NHANES调查中报告的直接测量的消耗频率。队列记录共享方法在食物消费分配的高端方面表现不佳。但是,在食物消费分布的中间范围内(通常在第40至70个百分位之间),与两天重复法相比,队列记录共享方法提供了更可靠的食物消费频率估计。在第70个百分位数和第95个百分位数之间,实际的食物消耗频率以及最实际的暴露值预期最有可能受这两种模拟方法提供的两个估计的限制。因此,这两种方法都是有用的。风险评估者必须针对预期目的选择最合适的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号