When large XML documents published from a database are maintained externally, it is inefficient to repeatedly recompute them when the database is updated. Vastly preferable is incremental update, as common for views stored in a data warehouse. However, to support schema-directed publishing, there may be no simple query that defines the mapping from the database to the external document. To meet the need for efficient incremental update, this paper studies two approaches for incremental evaluation of ATGs [4], a formalism for schema-directed XML publishing. The reduction approach seeks to push as much work as possible to the underlying DBMS. It is based on a relational encoding of XML trees and a nontrivial translation of ATGs to SQL 99 queries with recursion. However, a weakness of this approach is that it relies on high-end DBMS features rather than the lowest common denominator. In contrast, the bud-cut approach pushes only simple queries to the DBNS and performs the bulk of the work in middleware. It capitalizes on the tree-structure of XML views to minimize unnecessary recomputations and leverages optimization techniques developed for XML publishing. While implementation of the reduction approach is not yet in the reach of commercial DBMS, we have implemented the bud-cut approach and experimentally evaluated its performance compared to recomputation.
展开▼
