首页> 外文会议>Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual >Software engineering education should be presented as: A. Science B. Engineering C. Technology D. All of the above E. None of the above, other
【24h】

Software engineering education should be presented as: A. Science B. Engineering C. Technology D. All of the above E. None of the above, other

机译:软件工程教育应表现为:A.科学B.工程C.技术D.以上所有E.以上都不是,其他

获取原文

摘要

For many, the software engineering profession is still viewed as immature. The authors contend that a major problem has to do with the current educational model(s) for software. Most computer science graduates pursue careers in software development/software engineering. Only recently, a few B.S. in Software Engineering programs began their existence. Analyses of several of these programs reveal a lack of coherent design. Some are housed in an engineering school and have the 'flavor' of engineering but lack enough emphasis on software engineering core. Some are housed on traditional CS departments, have a strong CS component with a few SwE courses, and no engineering focus. What is the right "mix"? Which of the existing BSSwE programs can be accredited? What educational model will most likely help produce a professional software engineer? Science? Engineering? Technology? This paper addresses these and other related topics and controversial issues.
机译:对于许多人来说,软件工程专业仍然不成熟。作者认为,一个主要问题与当前的软件教育模型有关。大多数计算机科学专业的毕业生从事软件开发/软件工程的职业。直到最近,一些公元前在软件工程计划中,它们的存在开始了。对其中几个程序的分析表明缺乏一致的设计。有些位于一所工程学校,具有工程学的“风味”,但对软件工程核心的重视不足。其中一些设在传统的CS部门中,具有强大的CS组成部分,并提供一些SwE课程,并且没有工程重点。正确的“混合”是什么?哪些现有的BSSwE程序可以通过认证?哪种教育模式最有可能帮助产生专业的软件工程师?科学?工程?技术?本文讨论了这些以及其他相关主题和有争议的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号