首页> 外文会议>AIAA aviation forum;AIAA fluid dynamics conference >Comparative Analysis of the Arbitrary Mesh Interface (AMI), Generalized Grid Interface (GGI) and Overset Methods for Dynamic Body Motions in OpenFOAM
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of the Arbitrary Mesh Interface (AMI), Generalized Grid Interface (GGI) and Overset Methods for Dynamic Body Motions in OpenFOAM

机译:OpenFOAM中的任意网格接口(AMI),广义网格接口(GGI)和动态身体运动的重设方法的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

This paper focuses on the comparative performance of the well known Arbitrary Mesh Interface(AMI) and Generalized Grid Interface (GGI) methods in OpenFOAM and our in-house Overset grid tool (OPErA), all of which are used to compute the flow past moving bodies.To evaluate the performance of both approaches, the flow past a spinning cylinder at Re 50000 and a canonical wind turbine are considered. Force coefficients, mass conservation and parallel performance of the above approaches are illustrated. It is seen that the overset approach is able to reproduce similar results compared to AMI and GGI approaches with acceptable parallel overhead. While the GGI method is the fastest among the three, the parallel efficiency of all the methods fall in the same range.
机译:本文着重介绍OpenFOAM中众所周知的任意网格接口(AMI)和通用网格接口(GGI)方法以及我们内部的Overset网格工具(OPErA)的比较性能,所有这些方法均用于计算过去的流动为了评估这两种方法的性能,考虑了流经Re 50000处的旋转圆柱体和标准风力涡轮机的流量。说明了上述方法的力系数,质量守恒和并行性能。可以看出,与AMI和GGI方法相比,overset方法能够以可接受的并行开销重现相似的结果。尽管GGI方法是三种方法中最快的,但所有方法的并行效率都在同一范围内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号