首页> 外文会议>International conference on management of natural resources, sustainable development and ecological hazards >Evaluating inherently safer design alternatives using hazard conflict approach
【24h】

Evaluating inherently safer design alternatives using hazard conflict approach

机译:使用危险冲突方法评估固有的更安全的设计替代品

获取原文

摘要

The application of Inherent Safety (IS) principles and Inherently Safer Design (ISD) concept has been proven to reduce the risk of accidents and is economically attractive for chemical process plants. However, they also suffer from several trade-offs or conflicts that arise from the modification suggested by the concept. A design which is identified to be inherently safer from one hazard could possibly alter the magnitude of other hazards, which were previously not at a critical level. Therefore, an IS tool should emphasise this limitation before a decision can be made, in order to obtain the best ISD alternatives. This paper presents a likelihood tool to evaluate the potential hazard conflicts in ISD alternatives at preliminary design stage. The tool is part of a framework which is developed based on risk approach. The proposed tool is applied to hydrogen storage systems with the objective to prevent and minimise potential fire and explosion. The results have shown that the new tool is able to highlight the potential new hazards and variation of magnitude of existing hazards which emerged when the hydrogen storage is changed according to the ISD concept at preliminary design stage.
机译:已证明固有安全(是)原则和固有的更安全设计(ISD)概念的应用,以降低事故的风险,对化学工艺植物具有经济吸引力。然而,它们也遭受了概念建议的修改的几个权衡或冲突。被识别出从一个危害中固有的设计可能会改变以前不在临界水平的其他危险的大小。因此,在可以进行决定之前,应该强调这种限制,以便获得最佳ISD替代方案。本文提出了评估初步设计阶段的ISD替代品中潜在危害冲突的可能性工具。该工具是基于风险方法开发的框架的一部分。该拟议的工具适用于储氢系统,目的是防止和最小化潜在的火灾和爆炸。结果表明,当根据初步设计阶段的ISD概念改变储氢时,新工具能够突出潜在的新危险和现有危害的幅度变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号