首页> 外文会议>International conference on public administration >Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Hypothesis of Human Nature of Administrators
【24h】

Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Hypothesis of Human Nature of Administrators

机译:行政人员人性假设的解构与重构

获取原文

摘要

Public administration theories and administrative reform measures always involves the question of how to determine the human nature of administrators and this question is among the original ones when discussing the nature of administrators. Representative views of scholar domestic and abroad on this question concerns nothing more than two categories of hypotheses of human nature of administrators: one is economic person and the other public person, and these two hypotheses are contrary to each other. How should we treat this dichotomy? How should the human nature of administrators be selected or presumed? To answer these questions, this paper argues that five issues has to be resolved: first, the difference between economic person and economic person trend; second, the universality and finiteness of economic person; third, the design of human nature of the administrators as public man; fourth, the merits of economic person and public person; fifth, the certainty and uncertainty of the hypothesis of administrators. Actually, the boundary between the two hypotheses, i.e. economic person and public person is ambiguous and it is not necessary to tell which one is better. Due to the limitations of these two hypotheses when used in research or practice, deconstruction of them is needed. In the perspective of methodology, this dichotomy is to a large extent imputable to the anachronistic linear thinking pattern rather than the nonlinear thinking pattern and can hardly justifies itself when confronted with complicated issues. This paper contends that it may well be more complete and practical and more conducive to deepening the research in relevant areas and tackling practical problems effectively when the human nature of administrators is hypothesized as social person, and the introduction of the concept of social person into the area of administration also can avoid the quandary facing with the dichotomy through the way of linear thinking.
机译:公共行政理论和行政改革措施总是涉及到如何确定管理者的人性的问题,这个问题是讨论管理者本质时的原始问题。国内外学者对此问题的代表性看法只涉及管理者人性的两类假设:一类是经济人,另一种是公共人,这两种假设是相互矛盾的。我们应该如何对待这种二分法?应该如何选择或推定管理员的人性?为了回答这些问题,本文认为必须解决五个问题:第一,经济人与经济人趋势之间的差异;第二,经济人趋势与经济人趋势之间的差异。第二,经济人的普遍性和有限性;第三,行政人员作为公众人物的人性设计;第四,经济人和公众人的优点;第五,管理者假设的确定性和不确定性。实际上,经济人和公众人这两个假设之间的界限是模棱两可的,没有必要说出哪个更好。由于在研究或实践中使用这两个假设的局限性,需要对它们进行解构。从方法论的角度来看,这种二分法很大程度上归因于不合时宜的线性思维模式,而不是非线性思维模式,并且在面对复杂问题时很难为自己辩护。本文认为,如果将管理者的人性假设为社会人,将社会人的概念引入其中,可能会更完整,更实用,更有利于深化相关领域的研究,有效地解决实际问题。行政区域也可以通过线性思考的方式避免二分法面临的困境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号