首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Waste Management and Technology >How China can beat Europe in Environmental Legislation for Electronics
【24h】

How China can beat Europe in Environmental Legislation for Electronics

机译:中国如何在电子环境立法方面击败欧洲

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

China will develop environmental legislation like for recycling (Chinese WEEE) and substances (Chinese RoHS) in its own style. Elements of for instance European and Japanese Directives will be taken on board as well but this will happen on basis of proven merit. The current confusion in Europe about European WEEE and RoHS implementation will also give clear indications what to avoid. Possible developments in the legislations in China will offer towards the European Union the opportunity for review and modification and thus to pull their present Directives out of their crisis. There are five issues which could make that China will beat Europe in effectiveness of Environmental legislation for Electronics: 1. Clear separation between national laws (which are difficult to change) and implementation standards (which can be updated regularly) 2. Stronger upfront guidance on national level as regards organization principles and administrative procedures/formats 3. Use of product catalogs instead of (application based) categories definitions. 4. Determine room to maneuver on basis of ‘packages’ which eco-design, new technology and system organization can deliver for specific products or product groups in the product catalog. Taking this into account in target setting will be very effective. 5. No distinction between B2C (Business to Consumer) and B2B (Business to Business), no distinction between ‘’historical’’ and future’’ waste and only one collection system out of which several dedicated streams can be separated. In a more detailed analysis it will be made clear that especially the product catalog concept will be helpful to realize in practice the intent of the Chinese and European legislation. For WEEE the product catalog is to be based on a material composition of the product. Recycling of precious metal dominated products will result in the best environmental gains, followed by metal dominated products and glass dominated products. Plastic dominated products rank last in priority. For RoHS product and parts catalog can be built based on potential toxic analysis.
机译:中国将以自己的方式制定环保法规,如回收(WEEE)和物质(RoHS)。诸如欧洲和日本指令之类的要素也将被考虑在内,但这将基于已证明的优点。欧洲目前对欧洲WEEE和RoHS实施的困惑也将清楚地表明应避免的事情。中国法律的可能发展将为欧盟提供审查和修改的机会,从而将其现行指令从危机中解脱出来。有五个问题可以使中国在电子环境法规的有效性方面击败欧洲:1.国家法律(难以更改)和实施标准(可以定期更新)之间的明确区分。2.强有力的前期指导国家一级的组织原则和行政程序/格式。3.使用产品目录代替(基于应用程序的)类别定义。 4.根据生态设计,新技术和系统组织可以为产品目录中特定产品或产品组提供的“包装”来确定回旋余地。在目标设置中考虑到这一点将非常有效。 5. B2C(企业对消费者)和B2B(企业对企业)之间没有区别,“历史”和“未来”废物之间也没有区别,只有一个收集系统可以从中分离出几个专用流。通过更详细的分析,可以清楚地看到,尤其是产品目录概念将有助于在实践中实现中国和欧洲立法的意图。对于WEEE,产品目录应基于产品的材料成分。回收贵金属为主的产品将带来最大的环境效益,其次是金属为主的产品和玻璃为主的产品。以塑料为主的产品排在最后。对于RoHS,可以根据潜在的毒性分析建立产品和零件目录。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号