首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting;HFES 2008 >Graphical User Authentication: A Comparative Evaluation of Composite Scene Authentication vs. Three Competing Graphical Passcode Systems
【24h】

Graphical User Authentication: A Comparative Evaluation of Composite Scene Authentication vs. Three Competing Graphical Passcode Systems

机译:图形用户身份验证:复合场景身份验证与三种竞争性图形密码系统的比较评估

获取原文

摘要

Previous studies (Johnson & Werner, 2006; 2007) have shown that Composite Scene Authentication (CSA) passcodes are more memorable than alphanumeric passwords over extended retention intervals. This study evaluated the memorability of six types of graphical passcodes of varying complexity (including three variants of CSA passcodes) over thirty-minute and one-week retention intervals. The graphical passcodes were compared to one another, as well as to an alphanumeric password of equivalent bit length. A strong overall advantage in information retained was found for graphical passcodes (M = 92.83%) compared to alphanumeric passwords (M = 75.47%). In addition, CSA passcodes were remembered better (M = 97.1 %) than other graphical passcodes (M = 88.56%). An even larger difference was observed for percent successful logins for CSA passcodes (M = 84.23%) compared to other graphical passcodes (M= 56.39%) after the one-week retention interval. The variable bit lengths of the passcodes did not affect percent information retained.
机译:先前的研究(Johnson&Werner,2006; 2007)表明,在延长的保留时间间隔内,复合场景身份验证(CSA)密码比字母数字密码更容易记忆。这项研究评估了在30分钟和一周的保留时间间隔内六种类型的复杂性不同的图形密码(包括CSA密码的三种变体)的记忆性。将图形密码与彼此进行比较,并将其与等效位长的字母数字密码进行比较。与字母数字密码(M = 75.47%)相比,图形密码(M = 92.83%)在保留信息方面具有强大的总体优势。此外,与其他图形密码(M = 88.56%)相比,CSA密码被记住的更好(M = 97.1%)。在保留一周后,与其他图形密码(M = 56.39%)相比,CSA密码成功登录的百分比(M = 84.23%)观察到更大的差异。密码的可变位长不会影响保留的信息百分比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号