首页> 外文会议>Algorithmic Number Theory >A Comparison of CEILIDH and XTR
【24h】

A Comparison of CEILIDH and XTR

机译:CEILIDH和XTR的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We give a comparison of the performance of the recently proposed torus-based public key cryptosystem CEILIDH, and XTR. Underpinning both systems is the mathematics of the two dimensional algebraic torus T_6(F_p). However, while they both attain the same discrete logarithm security and each achieve a compression factor of three for all data transmissions, the arithmetic performed in each is fundamentally different. In its inception, the designers of CEILIDH were reluctant to claim it offers any particular advantages over XTR other than its exact compression and decompression technique. Prom both an algorithmic and arithmetic perspective, we develop an efficient version of CEILIDH and show that while it seems bound to be inherently slower than XTR, the difference in performance is much smaller than what one might infer from the original description. Also, thanks to CEILIDH'S simple group law, it provides a greater flexibility for applications, and may thus be considered a worthwhile alternative to XTR.
机译:我们对最近提出的基于环的公钥密码系统CEILIDH和XTR的性能进行了比较。两个系统的基础是二维代数圆环T_6(F_p)的数学。但是,尽管它们都获得相同的离散对数安全性,并且对于所有数据传输,它们各自都实现了3的压缩因子,但在每种方法中执行的算法本质上是不同的。从一开始,CEILIDH的设计人员就不愿声称它比XTR拥有除其确切的压缩和解压缩技术之外的任何特殊优势。从算法和算术的角度出发,我们开发了CEILIDH的高效版本,并显示了它似乎固有地比XTR慢,但性能上的差异却比从原始描述中推断出的要小得多。同样,由于CEILIDH的简单组法,它为应用程序提供了更大的灵活性,因此可以被认为是XTR的值得选择的替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号