【24h】

Just The Facts, Please

机译:请只是事实,请

获取原文

摘要

The paper presents a positionfor improved hazard identification through adequate mishap reporting. Tracking of mishap trends and lessons learned is discussed in the context of a positive indication of performance characteristics and actions that serve to identify and resolve or reduce residual risk. The paper further explores approaches to identifying sufficient standards for mishap reporting to more accurately support operational and system safety risk management efforts usign military experience. Rational for imposing increased reporting requirements for identified areas of higher exposure, greater consequences, or special interest is explored. Availability of mishap related information and effective system safety tracking documentation may be the only means to provide validation o system performance relative to safety concerns. Follow on options based on automated hazard tracking databases is also discussed as a parallel efforts in harmony with lessons learned based on mishap reporting. The paper asserts how adherence to selective mishap documentation requirements can assist safety professionals, engineers, and managers in more readily and proactively addressing safety realted field issues. Users of mishap databases would be allowed to concentrate more on performance characteristics and actions that ensure satisfactory safety performance than on defending the data. Reporting specifications are validated through examples and associated lessons learned. The paper includes different program approaches to safety related issues and incidents to demonstrate the flexibility and the utility of a properly specified reporting and tracking systems. The paper goes on to discuss the conflict between apparent success and potential failure based on most credible and worst possible outcomes. Approaches to giving a positive spin to the consideration and manipulation of numerous potnetial database issues is discussed. Intent is to present options for improved reporting by aviation operators and supplementation by informatio nmanagers that may result in improved databases of source information that more directly support system safety tools and processes.
机译:本文介绍了通过适当的Mishap报告改善危害识别的位置。在积极指出的情况下讨论了追踪Mishap趋势和经验教训,以识别和解决或减少残余风险的绩效特征和行动的积极指示。该论文进一步探讨了识别Mishap报告的足够标准的方法,以更准确地支持运营和系统安全风险管理努力使用军事经验。探讨了对更高曝光,更大后果或特殊利益的确定领域增加了报告要求的理性。 Mishap相关信息和有效系统安全跟踪文件的可用性可能是提供相对于安全问题验证O系统性能的唯一方法。遵循基于自动危险跟踪数据库的选项,也讨论了与基于Mishap报告的经验教训的并行努力。本文断言如何遵守选择性的事故文档要求,可以在更容易和积极地解决安全地位的现场问题中提供安全专业人士,工程师和管理者。 Mishap数据库的用户将被允许更多地专注于性能特征和操作,以确保安全性能的令人满意的安全性能而不是捍卫数据。通过示例和相关的经验教训验证了报告规范。本文包括对安全相关问题和事件的不同方案方法,以证明具有正确指定的报告和跟踪系统的灵活性和效用。本文继续讨论表观成功与潜在失败之间的冲突,基于最可靠和最糟糕的可能结果。讨论了对考虑和操纵众多动力数据库问题的积极旋转的方法。 Intent是为航空运营商改进的报告提供的选项,并通过信息Nmanagers补充,可能导致源信息的改进数据库,更直接支持系统安全工具和流程。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号