首页> 外文会议>The 18th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference >INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE WEED INFESTATION, WEED SEEDBANK AND TEA GROWTH IN RELATION TO THE DIFFERENT WEED MANAGEMENT METHODS IN YOUNG TEA (CAMELLIA SINENSIS L. KUNTZE) PLANTATION
【24h】

INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE WEED INFESTATION, WEED SEEDBANK AND TEA GROWTH IN RELATION TO THE DIFFERENT WEED MANAGEMENT METHODS IN YOUNG TEA (CAMELLIA SINENSIS L. KUNTZE) PLANTATION

机译:幼茶(茶树)的杂草侵害,杂草种子库和茶叶生长的调查与不同杂草处理方法的关系

获取原文

摘要

A field experiment was conducted in the Low-Country of Sri Lanka, during the period 1994 to 1995 to investigate weed seedbank density in soil and severity of weed infestation and growth of tea in relaion to weed management methods during early tea establishment. Manual weeding at various intervals was compared with the use of various herbicides, with and without mulching. Weed seedbanks were determined using "seed germination method" and "Malone's seed extraction method" before and 12 months after imposition of treatments. Seedbanks were reduced marginally (6%) (p>0.05) with the use of herbicides, but increased (40%) when manual weeding was less frequent than six week intervals. Glufosinate ammonium at 0.2 kg a.i. ha" and 2, 4-D at 0.94 kg a.i. ha~(-1) followed by at 0.17 paraquat kg a.i. ha~(-1) were less effective in weed control and had little influence on reducing seedbank density. Weed control with herbicides was superior to that of manual weeding (P<0.05). Manual weeding at six-week intervals and herbicide treatments affected tea growth similarly, but the former was not cost effective. Neither agronomic nor economic advantage was achieved with manual weeding at two-week intervals. Plots allowed to remain weedy for 12 weeks or more adversely affected tea growth. Application of oxyfluorfen at 0.29 kg a.i. ha~(-1) followed by paraquat at 0.17 kg a.i. ha~(-1) or glyphosate at 0.99 kg a.i. ha~(-1) was more cost effective and superior to manual weeding (p<0.05) at six-week intervals due to minimum weed infestation. Mulching of tea inter-rows with grass loppings (at 38 t. ha~(-1)) was more beneficial for tea than not mulching, whilst a live mulch of weeds suppressed tea growth. A combination of mulching and chemicals followed by manual weeding at 10-week intervals would appear to be the most appropriate integrated weed management system during establishment of young tea.
机译:1994年至1995年,在斯里兰卡低地国家进行了田间试验,调查了早期茶树建立过程中土壤杂草种子库的密度以及杂草侵害的严重程度以及茶的生长与杂草管理方法的关系。将不同间隔的手动除草与各种覆盖和不覆盖的除草剂的使用进行了比较。在施药前和施药后12个月,使用“种子发芽法”和“ Malone种子提取法”确定杂草种子库。使用除草剂后,种子库略有减少(6%)(p> 0.05),但是当人工除草的间隔少于六周时,种子库增加了(40%)。草铵膦铵盐,0.2公斤a.i. ha“和2,4-D在0.94 kg ai ha〜(-1)处,然后在0.17百草枯kg ai ha〜(-1)下对杂草的控制效果较差,对降低种子库密度的影响很小。优于人工除草(P <0.05)。间隔六周的人工除草和除草剂处理对茶树的生长有相似的影响,但前者的成本效益不高;人工除草两周既无农艺效益,也无经济优势。允许除草12周或更长时间,对茶树的生长有不利影响,在0.29 kg ai ha〜(-1)处施用氧氟芬,然后在0.17 kg ai ha〜(-1)处施用百草枯或在0.99 kg ai ha下施用草甘膦〜(-1)具有较高的成本效益,并且由于杂草最少,每六周间隔优于人工除草(p <0.05)。茶间行覆盖草丛(38 t。ha〜(-1) )比不覆盖更有益于茶,而杂草的活覆盖可抑制茶的生长。每隔10周进行一次除草和化学除草,然后进行人工除草,这似乎是幼茶建立过程中最合适的综合杂草管理系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号