首页> 外文会议> >Lessons Learned Applying Tools and Methodologies to Develop C4ISR Architecture Framework Compliant Architecture Products
【24h】

Lessons Learned Applying Tools and Methodologies to Develop C4ISR Architecture Framework Compliant Architecture Products

机译:应用工具和方法论开发符合C4ISR体系结构框架的体系结构产品的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With the advent of the Clinger-rnCohen Act of 1996 mandate to develop anrnenterprise information technology architecture,rnthere has been a more intensive focus by allrnfederal government agencies, and morernspecifically the DoD, on defining theirrninstantiation of an Enterprise ArchitecturernFramework. The Federal Enterprise ArchitecturernFramework (FEAF) was the first attempt torndocument the ground rules for variousrngovernment agencies to develop their ownrnarchitectures to be compliant with the intent ofrnClinger-Cohen. The DoD has adopted the FEAFrnand tailored it into the C4ISR ArchitecturernFramework (AF). The C4ISR AF Products arernrobust in terms of capturing the architecture, butrnare problematic when they need to be rigorouslyrnmodeled on the path to producing a system thatrnis compliant with that architecture. Thernrecommended documentation of the artifactsrnfrom this architecture is not consistent across allrnthe products from a system or softwarern"methodology representation" standpoint. Sincernthe introduction of the C4ISR AF, agencies andrncontractors have grappled with capturing thesernproducts (which represent different views of thernarchitecture) in a common repository forrnverification of completeness, consistency acrossrnviews, and accuracy of information representedrnin these views. This is a non-trivial challenge forrnthe U.S. Army Digitization effort that integratesrnexisting Army C4ISR systems and designs forrninteroperability. Lockheed Martin MissionrnSystems is providing systems engineering andrnintegration expertise in modernizing the U.S.rnArmy Battle Command Systems (11 “stovepipe”rnsystems) under the ongoing Systems of SystemsrnEngineering and Integration contract. Therncapture of this complex architecture is beingrnfacilitated through the use of a repository-basedrntool - System Architect 2001 (SA 2001) byrnPopkin Software. This paper highlights thernchallenges, lessons learned, and solutions whichrnhave come out of this effort to capture and modelrnthe C4ISR AF artifacts in a manner that is usefulrnto systems engineers and system architects. Thernproper utilization of these artifacts will enablernthe users and customers of this systems to have arnsystem design that meets their needs and can bernsuccessfully integrated as the Army matures to arnfield-able, totally integrated battle command andrncontrol system of systems.
机译:随着1996年的《克林格·科恩法案》(Clinger-rnCohen Act)的出现,该法案要求开发企业级信息技术体系结构,所有联邦政府机构,尤其是国防部,都更加着重于定义其对企业体系结构框架的实例化。联邦企业体系结构框架(FEAF)是首次尝试记录各种政府机构开发其自己的体系结构以符合Cringer-Cohen意图的基本规则。国防部采用了FEAFrn,并将其定制为C4ISR体系结构框架(AF)。就捕获体系结构而言,C4ISR AF产品不那么严格,但是当需要在生产符合该体系结构的系统的路径上对其进行严格建模时,它们就会成问题。从系统或软件的“方法表示法”的角度来看,该体系结构的工件的推荐文档在所有产品中均不一致。自从引入C4ISR AF以来,代理机构和承包商一直在努力在通用存储库中捕获主要产品(代表体系结构的不同视图),以验证完整性,跨视图一致性以及这些视图中表示的信息的准确性。对于美国陆军数字化工作而言,这是一项不小的挑战,它将现有的陆军C4ISR系统与可交互操作性设计集成在一起。洛克希德·马丁公司的使命系统部正在提供系统工程和集成方面的专业知识,以根据正在进行的系统工程和集成系统合同对美国陆军作战指挥系统(11个“火炉”系统)进行现代化改造。通过使用基于仓库的rntool-System Architect 2001(SA 2001)byrnPopkin Software,可以简化这种复杂体系结构的捕获。本文重点介绍了以这种对系统工程师和系统架构师有用的方式捕获和建模C4ISR AF工件的努力所面临的挑战,经验教训和解决方案。对这些工件的正确利用将使该系统的用户和客户能够拥有满足其需求的信息系统设计,并且随着陆军逐渐成熟为可在信息场使用的,完全集成的战斗指挥和系统控制系统而能够成功集成。

著录项

  • 来源
    《》|2002年|p.1-10|共10页
  • 会议地点 Las Vegas NV(US);Las Vegas NV(US)
  • 作者

    David Rice; Abraham Meilich;

  • 作者单位

    Popkin Software11 Park PlaceNew York, New York 10007David.ricew@popkin.com;

    Lockheed Martin Mission Systems8080 Grainger CourtSpringfield, Virginia 22153abraham.w.meilich@lmco.com;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 系统工程;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-26 14:03:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号