首页> 外文会议> >Application of the NASA risk assessment tool to the evaluation of the Space Shuttle external tank re-welding process
【24h】

Application of the NASA risk assessment tool to the evaluation of the Space Shuttle external tank re-welding process

机译:NASA风险评估工具在航天飞机外舱再焊接过程评估中的应用

获取原文

摘要

The current Space Shuttle external tank design is called the super light weight tank (SLWT). A weight reduction of approximately 30% was achieved relative to the prior design called the light weight tank (LWT). The new NASA risk assessment tool, the quantitative risk assessment system (QRAS), was used to compare the risk of the two designs. The comparison includes consideration of the apparent reduction of the design safety factor for SLWT welds when a weld repair is required. The risk models for the structural failure accident scenario include five initiating events (IEs): (1) liquid oxygen (LO2) tank component failure; (2) liquid hydrogen (LH2) tank component failure; (3) LO2 tank weld failure; (4) LH2 tank weld failure; and (5) intertank failure. Although the risk results for the LH2 and LO2 tank welds for IEs 2 and 4 are higher for the SLWT vs. the LWT, the reverse is true for tank components IEs 1, 3 and 5. The SLWT has a slightly lower risk of structural failure. The impact of this difference is not significant to the total risk when the other six scenarios are also included.
机译:当前的航天飞机外部水箱设计被称为超轻型水箱(SLWT)。相对于称为轻型储罐(LWT)的现有设计,实现了约30%的重量减轻。新的NASA风险评估工具,定量风险评估系统(QRAS),用于比较两种设计的风险。进行比较时,考虑了在需要维修焊缝时,SLWT焊缝的设计安全系数明显降低的情况。结构性故障事故场景的风险模型包括五个启动事件(IE):(1)液氧(LO2)储罐部件故障; (2)液氢(LH2)罐部件故障; (3)LO2储罐焊接失败; (4)LH2罐焊接失败; (5)坦克间故障。尽管对于SLWT而言,IE 2和4的LH2和LO2储罐焊缝的风险结果要比LWT高,但对于IE 1、3和5的储罐组件,情况恰恰相反。SLWT的结构失效风险略低。当还包括其他六个方案时,这种差异的影响对总风险并不重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号