首页> 外文会议> >Quantitative comparison of intracellular disposition between artificial and viral vector: Mechanism underlying the difference in dominant rate-limiting process
【24h】

Quantitative comparison of intracellular disposition between artificial and viral vector: Mechanism underlying the difference in dominant rate-limiting process

机译:人工和病毒载体胞内配置的定量比较:显性限速过程中差异的潜在机制

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

For developing of non-viral gene vectors sufficient for clinical application, it is necessary to understand why and to what extent non-viral vectors are inferior to the viral vectors, which in general exhibit more efficient transfection activity. This study describes a systematic and quantitative comparison of intracellular trafficking (iPK) of exogenous DNA transfected by viral and non-viral vectors in living cells, which is a hybrid of cellular uptake and subsequent intracellular distribution (e.g. endosome/lysosome, cytosol and nucleus). As a model, adenovirus and LipofectAMINE PLUS (LFN) was used for comparison since they are highly potent and widely used viral and non-viral vectors, respectively. Comparison of intracellular trafficking between adenovirus and LipofectAMINE PLUS (LFN) revealed that the three orders of magnitude lower transfection efficiency of LFN was dominantly rate-limited by the post-nuclear delivery process (Pharmacodynamics: PD). The contribution of transcription and translation processes to the overall differences in the trans-gene expression efficiency of PD was further evaluated by quantifying mRNA. As a result, transcription efficiency (Etranscript) of LFN, denoted as transgene expression divided by the amount of nuclear pDNA was about 16 times less than that for adenovirus. Furthermore, translation efficiency (Etranslate), denoted as transfection activity divided by mRNA expression was approximately 460 times less in LFN. Imaging of the decondensed form of DNA by in situ hybridization revealed that poor decondensation efficiency of LFN is involved in the inferior Etranscript. Collectively, an improvement in nuclear decondensation and the diminution of the interaction between vector and mRNA is essential for the development of new generations of non-viral vectors.
机译:为了开发足以用于临床的非病毒基因载体,有必要了解为什么非病毒载体在何种程度上逊于通常表现出更有效转染活性的病毒载体。这项研究描述了在活细胞中被病毒和非病毒载体转染的外源DNA细胞内运输(iPK)的系统和定量比较,这是细胞摄取和随后的细胞内分布(例如内体/溶酶体,胞质和细胞核)的混合体。作为模型,腺病毒和LipofectAMINE PLUS(LFN)被用作比较模型,因为它们分别是高效的病毒和广泛使用的病毒和非病毒载体。腺病毒和LipofectAMINE PLUS(LFN)之间的细胞内运输比较表明,LFN的三个较低的转染效率主要受核后传递过程的速率限制(药效学:PD)。转录和翻译过程对PD转基因表达效率总体差异的贡献通过定量mRNA进一步评估。结果,LFN的转录效率(Etranscript)(表示为转基因表达除以核pDNA的量)比腺病毒的转录效率低约16倍。此外,翻译效率(Etranslate)(表示为转染活性除以mRNA表达)在LFN中大约少460倍。通过原位杂交对DNA的缩合形式进行成像显示,劣质的Etranscript涉及LFN的较差的缩合效率。总的来说,核解聚作用的改善以及载体与mRNA之间相互作用的减少对于新一代非病毒载体的开发至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号