首页> 外文会议> >Comparison of instructional modalities for a course 'Introduction to Computing in Engineering'
【24h】

Comparison of instructional modalities for a course 'Introduction to Computing in Engineering'

机译:“工程计算概论”课程的教学方式比较

获取原文

摘要

The Vanderbilt University School of Engineering requires all engineering students in their first semester to take a course which introduces computers in engineering. The question always arises about the best setting in which to teach this type of material: a combination of lecture and laboratory, or all laboratory. This year (2000), the course was organized with two different modalities of instruction. One was the lecture/laboratory and the other the all laboratory structure. At the end of the semester an in-depth questionnaire with quantitative ratings was given to the students to determine if there were differences in learning effectiveness. Contingency tables were used to compare responses. There were several statistically significant differences in student responses favoring the all laboratory structure. Several of them are: the students are much more comfortable with computers at the end of the semester; laboratory was by far the preferred setting for learning the computational topics; and lecture was not a preferred setting for learning any topic.
机译:范德比尔特大学工程学院要求所有工程学学生在其第一学期参加一门介绍工程学计算机的课程。总是出现有关教授此类材料的最佳设置的问题:讲座和实验室的组合,或所有实验室的组合。今年(2000年),本课程采用两种不同的授课方式进行组织。一个是讲座/实验室,另一个是整个实验室的结构。在学期末,向学生提供了具有定量评分的深入调查表,以确定学习效果是否存在差异。列联表用于比较响应。在对所有实验室结构有利的学生反应中,存在统计学上的显着差异。其中一些是:学期末学生对计算机的适应程度更高;到目前为止,实验室是学习计算主题的首选环境;而且讲课不是学习任何主题的首选背景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号