首页> 外文会议>Life cycle assessment and other assessment tools for waste management and resource optimization >LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF OLIVE OIL ADDRESSING ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS: HOW TO DEAL WITH OLIVE POMACE VALORIZATION?
【24h】

LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF OLIVE OIL ADDRESSING ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS: HOW TO DEAL WITH OLIVE POMACE VALORIZATION?

机译:橄榄油替代生产系统的生命周期评估:如何利用橄榄油气化进行交易?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Olive oil is an important product of the so-called "Mediterranean Diet". In Portugal, about 90 000 tonnes of olive oil were produced yearly in the last agricultural campaigns. The main objective of this paper is to present a comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA) of olive oil produced from four types of cultivation systems (familiar, traditional, intensive and organic) and two olive oil extraction processes (three-phase and two-phase extraction), addressing the valorization of olive pomace. The most remarkable difference between three- and two-phase extraction is related to the co-products and residues produced: the three-phase process results in three fractions (olive oil, olive pomace and olive mill wastewater), whereas the two-phase extraction (a more recent and increasingly used process in order to avoid the production of olive mill wastewater) consumes less water and generates, together with olive oil, a suspension called olive wet pomace. A life-cycle model and inventory was implemented for the entire olive oil chain, including olive cultivation and olive oil extraction (about 5-7 kg of olives are required to produce one liter of olive oil), as well as valorization of olive pomace (three-phase extraction) and olive wet pomace (two-phase) to produce olive pomace oil and extracted pomace. Two approaches for dealing with multifunctionality were analyzed: i) allocation based on market prices of coproducts (olive oil and olive pomace) and ii) substitution ("avoided burdens" approach) of extracted pomace (displacing conventional fuel in energy intensive processes) and olive pomace oil (displacing virgin oil in biodiesel production). The environmental impacts were calculated for four impact categories (ReCiPe method): greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity, terrestrial acidification, freshwater and marine eutrophication. The cumulative energy demand (CED) method was used to calculate non-renewable primary energy (NRPE). The results (price based allocation) showed that olive cultivation was the life-cycle phase which contributed the most to the overall environmental impacts (55-95% to GHG intensity, 80-98% to acidification and 70-100% to eutrophication), except for the familiar cultivation system with no fertilizers and pesticides being applied. Fertilizers production and application contributed more than 43% to the environmental impacts of traditional, intensive and organic cultivation. Results calculated with the "avoided burdens" approach are highly dependent on the type of virgin oil displaced by olive pomace oil. This research shows the importance of olive cultivation practices and olive pomace valorization to reduce the life-cycle impacts of olive oil.
机译:橄榄油是所谓的“地中海饮食”的重要产品。在葡萄牙,最近一次农业运动每年生产约9万吨橄榄油。本文的主要目的是要对四种类型的种植系统(熟悉的,传统的,集约的和有机的)和两种橄榄油提取工艺(三相和两步法)生产的橄榄油进行比较生命周期评估(LCA)。相提取),解决橄榄果渣的增值问题。三相萃取和两相萃取之间最显着的差异与产生的副产物和残留物有关:三相过程产生三个馏分(橄榄油,橄榄果渣和橄榄磨废水),而两相萃取(为了避免产生橄榄磨坊废水而采用的最新工艺和越来越多的工艺)消耗的水更少,并且与橄榄油一起产生称为橄榄湿果渣的悬浮液。已为整个橄榄油链实施了生命周期模型和清单,包括橄榄种植和橄榄油提取(生产一升橄榄油需要约5-7公斤橄榄),以及橄榄果渣的增值(三相提取)和橄榄果渣(两相)生产橄榄果渣油和提取的果渣。分析了两种处理多功能性的方法:i)基于副产品(橄榄油和橄榄果渣)的市场价格进行分配,并且ii)提取的果渣(替代能源密集型工艺中的传统燃料)和橄榄渣的替代品(“避免负担”方法)果渣油(代替生物柴油生产中的原始油)。计算了四个影响类别(ReCiPe方法)的环境影响:温室气体(GHG)强度,陆地酸化,淡水和海洋富营养化。累积能源需求(CED)方法用于计算不可再生的一次能源(NRPE)。结果(基于价格的分配)显示,橄榄种植是生命周期阶段,对整个环境影响贡献最大(GHG强度占55-95%,酸化占80-98%,富营养化占70-100%),除了不使用化肥和杀虫剂的熟悉的栽培系统外。化肥的生产和使用对传统,集约化和有机耕作的环境影响贡献了43%以上。用“避免负担”方法计算的结果高度依赖于由橄榄果渣油替代的初榨油的类型。这项研究表明,橄榄种植实践和橄榄果渣的增值对减少橄榄油对生命周期的影响至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号