首页> 外文会议>ISES (International Solar Energy Society) 2001 Solar World Congress Vol.2; Nov 25-30, 2001; Adelaide, Australia >Comparison of the Optics of Non-Tracking and Novel Types of Tracking Solar Thermal Collectors for Process Heat Applications up to 300℃
【24h】

Comparison of the Optics of Non-Tracking and Novel Types of Tracking Solar Thermal Collectors for Process Heat Applications up to 300℃

机译:非跟踪式和新型跟踪式太阳能集热器在300℃以下过程热应用中的光学性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Evacuated CPC collectors with non-tracking reflectors are compared with two novel tracking collectors: a parabolic trough and an evacuated tube collector with integrated tracking reflector. Non-tracking low concentrating CPC collectors are mostly mounted in east-west direction with a latitude dependent slope angle. They are suitable at most for working temperatures up to 200 - 250℃. We present a tracking evacuated tube-collector with a trough-like concentrating mirror. Single-axis tracking of the mirror is realized with a magnetic mechanism. The mirror is mounted inside the evacuated tube and hence protected from environmental influences. One axis tracking in combination with a small acceptance angle allows for higher concentration as compared to non-tracking concentrating collectors. Ray-tracing analysis shows a half acceptance angle of about 5.7° at geometrical concentration ratio of 3.2. Losses of well constructed evacuated tube collectors (heat conductivity through the manifolds inside the thermally insulated terminating housing are low) are dominated by radiation losses of the absorber. Hence, reducing the absorber size can lead to higher efficiencies at high operating temperature levels. With the presented collector we aim for operating temperatures up to 350℃. At temperatures of 300℃ we expect with antireflective coating of the glass tube and a selective absorber coating efficiencies of 0.65. This allows for application in industrial process heat generation, high efficient solar cooling and power generation. A first prototype, equipped with a standard glass tube and a black paint absorber coating, was tested at ZAE Bayern. The optical efficiency was measured to be 0.71. This tube-collector is compared by ray-tracing with non-tracking market available tube-collectors with geometrical concentration ratios up to 1.1 and with a low cost parabolic trough collector of Industrial Solar Technology (IST) with an acceptance half angle about 1.5°, a geometrical concentration ratio of 14.4 and a measured optical efficiency of 0.69.
机译:将具有非跟踪反射器的撤离的CPC收集器与两个新颖的跟踪收集器进行比较:抛物槽和带集成跟踪反射器的真空管收集器。非跟踪式低浓度CPC收集器大部分安装在东西方向,且纬度与坡度有关。它们最适合最高200-250℃的工作温度。我们提出了一个跟踪真空管收集器与槽状集中镜。镜子的单轴跟踪是通过磁力机制实现的。镜子安装在真空管内,因此不受环境影响。与非跟踪式集尘器相比,单轴跟踪与小接受角相结合可实现更高的浓度。射线追踪分析显示在几何浓度比为3.2时,半接收角约为5.7°。构造良好的真空管集热器的损失(通过隔热终端壳体内部歧管的热导率低)主要由吸收器的辐射损失决定。因此,减小吸收器的尺寸可以在较高的工作温度水平下产生更高的效率。使用提出的收集器,我们的目标是最高工作温度为350℃。在300℃的温度下,我们预期玻璃管的抗反射涂层和选择性吸收体涂层的效率为0.65。这可以应用于工业过程中的热量产生,高效的太阳能冷却和发电。配备标准玻璃管和黑色涂料吸收剂涂层的第一个原型在ZAE Bayern进行了测试。测得的光学效率为0.71。将该射线管收集器通过射线跟踪与市场上可买到的几何浓度比高达1.1的非跟踪管收集器以及工业太阳能技术(IST)的低成本抛物槽收集器(可接受的半角约为1.5°)进行了比较,几何浓度比为14.4,测得的光学效率为0.69。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号