【24h】

Two Approaches to CMM~(TM) Integration

机译:CMM〜(TM)集成的两种方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The number of process improvmemt models and standards is vast (Sheard 1997), (Quagmire 1997). Even restricting consideration to official Cap[ability Maturity Models~(SM))~1 leaves a large enough number of models that an organization attempting to mature its processes has a variety to choose from, each with a different focus. The decision of which model to select may be difficult as there may be parts of two or ore models that are needed to meet all of the organization's improvement objectives. In these cases, per=haps the best choice is not to choose, but to integrate. Two U.S. government organizations, the Federal Aviation administration (FAA) and U.S. Army Simulation, Traning and Instrumentation Command (STRICOM) have consolidated existing CMMs into integrated models that best fit each organization's needs. This paper describes the two approaches used to accomplish the CMM integration.
机译:过程改进模型和标准的数量众多(Sheard 1997)(Quagmire 1997)。甚至将考虑限制在官方的能力成熟度模型(SM)〜1上,也留下了足够多的模型,一个试图成熟其流程的组织可以选择各种各样的模型,每个模型都有不同的重点。选择哪种模型可能很困难,因为可能需要满足组织的所有改进目标的两种或两种矿石模型中的某些部分。在这些情况下,也许最好的选择不是选择,而是整合。美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)和美国陆军模拟,训练与仪器司令部(STRICOM)这两个美国政府组织已将现有的CMM整合为最适合每个组织需求的集成模型。本文介绍了用于完成CMM集成的两种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号