首页> 外文会议>Innovate integrate amp; invigorate >Market Survey - Commercial Reliability, Availability and Maintainability Engineering Software
【24h】

Market Survey - Commercial Reliability, Availability and Maintainability Engineering Software

机译:市场调查-商业可靠性,可用性和可维护性工程软件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In aerospace projects increased reliability, availability and maintainability (RAM) is an important contribution to the reduction of the technical and financial risks. So called RAM Engineering software makes it easier to perform such analyses, particularly in early development phases.rnThe objective of this work is the investigation of commercially available tools (e.g. AvSim+, OpSSim, RAPTOR, Relex, ...) for the application at the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company. The tool should be adapted to the specific requirement of future users.rnThe requirements for a RAM Engineering Tool are expressed in KO-Criteria, Criteria and their corresponding weighting factors Altogether 13 RAM Engineering software, which are available on the market, were analyzed. Information about the products was collected, in order to conduct a qualitative comparison of their abilities. After a preselection nine products were tested on the basis of an example system and afterwards evaluated regarding the determined criteria and their weighting factors.rnThe investigation suggests that the market does not offer an optimal tool for all applications at EADS, but each tool has its strengths and weaknesses. The result of the evaluation determines the software, which offers the best compromise for the calculation of the reliability and the inherent and achieved availability. However different tools are recommended for special applications like the calculation of the mission reliability or the operational availability.
机译:在航空航天项目中,提高可靠性,可用性和可维护性(RAM)是减少技术和财务风险的重要贡献。所谓的RAM工程软件使执行这样的分析变得更容易,尤其是在早期开发阶段。这项工作的目的是研究针对商用应用的商用工具(例如AvSim +,OpSSim,RAPTOR,Relex等)。欧洲航空防务和航天公司。该工具应适应未来用户的特定要求。rn对RAM工程工具的要求以KO-标准,标准及其相应的权重因子表示,共有13种RAM工程软件(已在市场上出售)进行了分析。收集了有关产品的信息,以便对其功能进行定性比较。经过预选后,在一个示例系统的基础上测试了九种产品,然后对确定的标准及其权重因子进行了评估。调查表明,市场并不能为EADS的所有应用提供最佳工具,但是每种工具都有其优势和弱点。评估结果决定了软件,该软件为计算可靠性以及固有的和实现的可用性提供了最佳折衷方案。但是,对于特殊应用,建议使用不同的工具,例如任务可靠性或操作可用性的计算。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Melbourne(AU)
  • 作者单位

    European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company Military Aircraft, Dept. MB414: Reliability/Safety P.O. Box 80 11 60, 81663 Munich, Germany nathalie.filliol@m.dasa.de;

    rnEuropean Aeronautic Defence and Space Company Military Aircraft, Dept. MB414: Reliability/Safety P.O. Box 80 11 60, 81663 Munich, Germany joachim.staeritz@m.dasa.de;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 系统工程;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-26 14:03:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号