【24h】

The Mission Dependency Index: Fallacies andMisuses

机译:任务依赖指数:谬误和误解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The U.S. Infrastructure is extensive and faces performance, physicalrndeterioration, natural disaster, terrorism, and social challenges. The problem is furtherrncompounded by the fact that funds are limited. Decision-makers need to prioritize theirrnassets on the basis of risk and allocate budgets accordingly. The response to this situationrnhas been the quest for a simple equation that quantifies risk in terms of ordinal numbers.rnUnfortunately, most proposed risk indices are seriously flawed and likely to lead to badrndecisions. This paper first focuses on the Mission Dependency Index (MDI) as anrnexample of an over-simplified model that has gained wide acceptance for ranking facilityrnrisk. It then proposes the Operational Risk Failure Modes and Effects Analysisrn(ORFMEA) as a rational method for analyzing potential threats to facilities and link tornmissions. The ORFMEA enhances the standard Operational Risk Management (ORM)rnassessment by incorporating vulnerability and facility/mission time criticality.
机译:美国基础设施广泛,面临性能,自然退化,自然灾害,恐怖主义和社会挑战。资金有限的事实进一步加剧了这个问题。决策者需要根据风险对资产进行优先排序,并相应地分配预算。对这种情况的反应一直是寻求一个简单的等式来按序数对风险进行量化。不幸的是,大多数提议的风险指标存在严重缺陷,并可能导致错误的决策。本文首先关注任务依赖性指数(MDI),作为过度简化模型的一个示例,该模型已被广泛接受,可以对设施风险进行排名。然后,提出了操作风险失效模式和后果分析(ORFMEA),作为分析设施潜在威胁和链接故障的合理方法。 ORFMEA通过整合漏洞和设施/任务时间的关键性来增强标准的操作风险管理(ORM)评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号