首页> 外文会议>IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences >Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability of Quantitative Upper Limb Spasticity Evaluation based on Modified Ashworth Scale Tool
【24h】

Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability of Quantitative Upper Limb Spasticity Evaluation based on Modified Ashworth Scale Tool

机译:基于改进的Ashworth量表工具的定量上肢痉挛评估的等级间和等级内可靠性

获取原文

摘要

Clinical assessments of muscle spasticity are done by physiotherapists with the help of assessment scales. The gold standard is by using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), in which the scale quantifies the level of muscle spasticity by measuring resistance to passive movements. However, this scale is highly subjective to the assessors' opinions and experiences. Therefore, we proposed Muscle Spasticity Assessment System (MSAS) as an attempt to add objective weights to the current spasticity assessment method. In this study, inter-rater reliability of MSAS and its intra-rater reliability with MAS are presented. 46 subjects with neurological disorders participated in this study. Inter-rater reliability for clinical and MSAS assessment method gives substantial to excellent (Kappa value 0.82) and excellent (Kappa value 0.99) respectively. For both methods, intra-rater proved to give excellent result. MSAS are accurate and reliable in assisting the physiotherapist to quantify the spasticity of the upper limbs.
机译:物理治疗师在评估量表的帮助下对肌肉痉挛进行临床评估。金标准是使用改良的Ashworth量表(MAS),其中该量表通过测量对被动运动的抵抗力来量化肌肉痉挛的程度。但是,该量表在很大程度上取决于评估者的意见和经验。因此,我们提出了肌肉痉挛评估系统(MSAS),旨在为当前的痉挛评估方法增加客观的权重。在这项研究中,提出了MSAS的评分者间可靠性及其与MAS的评分者内可靠性。有神经系统疾病的46名受试者参加了这项研究。临床和MSAS评估方法的评分者间可靠性分别为优(Kappa值0.82)和优(Kappa值0.99)。对于这两种方法,事实证明内部评估者可提供出色的结果。 MSAS在协助理疗师量化上肢的痉挛程度方面是准确而可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号