首页> 外文会议>Humanity, science, technology: The systemic foundations of the information age >TOWARDS THE ART OF THINKING WITH UNCERTAINTY A story of the troubled relationship of the Western mind with complexity
【24h】

TOWARDS THE ART OF THINKING WITH UNCERTAINTY A story of the troubled relationship of the Western mind with complexity

机译:走向不确定性思维的艺术一个关于西方思维与复杂性之间关系混乱的故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper is an investigation into the relationship of truth with uncertainty in thernWestern intellectual tradition. It is suggested that the Western approach to truth hasrnessentially been one of thinking against and around uncertainty, and that we are presentlyrnchallenged to learn to think with uncertainty, if our further pursuit of truth is to be fruitful.rnMy approach is basically metaphorical as a mode of thinking that more easilyrnaccommodates uncertainty and complexity. I start by noting the difficulty that Westernrnscience and philosophy seem to have with the implications of thernuncertainty/indeterminacy that has come with the increasing complexity of the views andrnthe realities dealt with. The sciences of complexity depict the nature of our world as arncomplex, fluid whole, as a world of process and dynamic interrelations. Yet, even in thosernsciences there is a remarkable resistance to accepting complexity as irreducible andrnindeterminacy or uncertainty as an ineradicable feature of all our human knowledge. Irnsuggest that our very notion of "truth" is at odds with complexity and uncertainty. Basedrnon the work of the transdisciplinary thinker Morin, who proposes that in a complex worldrnthe very organization of our knowledge and the structure of our thinking have to berncomplex and allow for such insults to traditional logic as paradox, recursivity, orrnuncertainty, and drawing on the writings of the eco-philosopher Abram, who emphasizesrnthe crucial role of alphabetic literacy in the shaping of the Western approach to truth, thisrnpaper offers a possible deconstruction of our Western notion of truth as based inrnabstraction, in the logic of literal-minded thinking, and in reductionistic simplification.rnThe search for the Truth—the grand unifying theory, the absolute, God—, as a strivingrnfor certainty, is shown to be antagonistic to complexity and depicted as obstructing thernway to the Unknown, the abyss beyond all grounds of certainty. The Western striving forrncertainty is considered a cultural attempt to provide a rationally-derivedrnexistential/metaphysical grounding that would substitute the lost sense of ecological,rnsocial, and spiritual embeddedness characteristic of prehistoric and present-dayrnIndigenous oral cultures. The construction of a rationally solid, metaphysical ground ofrncertainty, as executed by Descartes and as essential to the Scientific Revolution, is arnprerequisite a) for the Western project of erecting an artificial, static structure ofrnphilosophical truths or scientific facts and laws over a dynamic world of process andrnuncertainty and b) for an increasingly autonomous ego to keep safe and afloat on such anrnocean of flux and dynamic interrelations. Finally, uncertainty is explored as intrinsicallyrnrelated to—rather than antithetical to—truth, and as key for a complex integration of thernobjectifying, abstracting, methodologically and conceptually mediated way to truth of
机译:本文是对西方知识传统中真理与不确定性之间关系的研究。建议西方人对真理的匆忙处理是对不确定性进行思考和解决的一种方法,如果我们对真理的进一步追求要卓有成效,那么我们现在就可以学会对不确定性进行思考。更容易容纳不确定性和复杂性的想法。首先,我指出西方科学和哲学似乎面临的不确定性/不确定性所带来的困难,而不确定性/不确定性则伴随着观点和现实的日益复杂化而来。复杂性科学将我们的世界描述为无序复杂,流动的整体,过程和动态相互联系的世界。然而,即使在那些科学中,人们也强烈地拒绝接受复杂性,将其视为人类所有知识的不可消灭的特征,即不可还原,不确定性或不确定性。这说明我们对“真相”的理解与复杂性和不确定性相矛盾。基于跨学科思想家莫林的工作,莫林认为,在一个复杂的世界中,我们的知识和思想结构的组织必须变得复杂,并要冒犯诸如悖论,递归,不确定性之类的传统逻辑,并借鉴著作。生态哲学家亚伯兰(Abram)强调字母素养在塑造西方对真理的态度中的关键作用。这篇文章为我们的西方真理概念提供了可能的解构,即以理性思维为基础,以字面思维为基础的逻辑。简化性的简化。寻求真相(宏大的统一理论,绝对神)作为对确定性的努力,被证明对复杂性不利,并且被描绘为阻碍通往未知之路的超越,这是超越所有确定性理由的深渊。西方人对争取确定性的努力被认为是一种文化尝试,旨在提供一种合理衍生的存在/形而上学基础,以取代史前和当今土著口头文化在生态,社会和精神方面的固有丧失感。由笛卡尔(Descartes)执行并构成科学革命必不可少的合理坚实的形而上学的不确定性基础是a)西方项目的一个先决条件,该项目是在一个动态的世界范围内建立人为的,静态的哲学真理或科学事实和法律的静态结构。过程和不确定性;以及b)越来越自主的自我,以确保在这样的通量和动态相互关系的领域中安全和漂浮。最后,不确定性被探究为与真理内在相关而不是相反,并且是客观地,抽象地,方法上和概念上介导的真理的复杂整合的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号