Many studies have compared oral brainstorming and electronic poolwriting meetings, but few have investigatedrnother brainwriting techniques. One alternative, electronic gallery writing, might be superior. A study ofrnstudents in 12, 10-member groups using manual and electronic versions of these two brainwriting methodsrnshows that gallery writing was preferred in part because of it's ability to show all public comments at any onerntime and over the course of the meeting. Although more raw comments were generated with poolwriting, therernwas no significant difference in the number of relevant comments. These results support findings from earlierrnlaboratory experiments and case studies.
展开▼
