首页> 外文会议>Association for Information Systems Americas conference on information systems;AMCIS 2003 >IS JOURNAL RANKINGS VERSUS CITATION ANALYSIS:CONSISTENCY AND CONCERNS
【24h】

IS JOURNAL RANKINGS VERSUS CITATION ANALYSIS:CONSISTENCY AND CONCERNS

机译:是期刊排名与引文分析:一致性和担忧

获取原文

摘要

This study investigates relationship between the journal ranking lists reported in previous studies on IS journalquality and the rankings derived based on citation data. Journals are categorized into pure, hybrid, partial,and non-IS journals. A total of 8,023 articles published in 38 journals are analyzed and 27,567 citations madeto these articles are collected. Five citation-based indices are derived from the collected citation data.Correlation analyses are conducted to examine the relationship and results show strong relationships only forpure IS journals. Then, a concern regarding which journals should be included on IS journal ranking lists,practical implication, further research, and limitations are discussed.
机译:本研究调查了先前关于IS期刊质量的研究中报告的期刊排名列表与基于引文数据得出的排名之间的关系。期刊分为纯,混合,部分和非IS期刊。总共对38种期刊上的8,023篇文章进行了分析,并收集了对这些文章的27,567条引用。从收集到的引文数据中得出五个基于引文的索引,并进行了相关分析以检查这种关系,结果表明只有纯IS期刊才具有强关系。然后,讨论了有关哪些期刊应纳入IS期刊排名列表的担忧,实践意义,进一步的研究和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号