首页> 外文会议>Asia-Pacific Conference on Simulated Evolution and Learning(SEAL'2002); 20021118-22; Singapore(SG) >EVALUATING EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS USING RUNNING PERFORMANCE METRICS
【24h】

EVALUATING EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS USING RUNNING PERFORMANCE METRICS

机译:使用运行性能指标评估演化的多目标优化算法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With the popularity of evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) methods among researchers and practitioners, an increasing interest has grown in developing new and computationally efficient algorithms and in comparing them with existing methods. Unlike in single-objective optimization in which often the goal is to find a single optimal solution, an EMO method attempts to find a set of well-converged and well-distributed set of trade-off solutions. In comparing two or more EMO methods, it is intuitive that more than one performance metrics are necessary. Although there exist a number of performance metrics in the EMO literature, they are usually applied to the final non-dominated set obtained by an EMO algorithm to evaluate its performance. In this chapter, we emphasize the need of running performance metrics, which will provide the dynamics of the working of an EMO algorithm. Either using a known Pareto-optimal front or an agglomeration of generation-wise populations, two suggested metrics reveal important insights and interesting dynamics of the working of an EMO and help provide a comparative evaluation of two or more EMO methods.
机译:随着研究人员和从业人员对进化多目标优化(EMO)方法的普及,人们对开发新的,计算效率高的算法以及将其与现有方法进行比较的兴趣日益浓厚。与单目标优化(通常目标是找到一个最佳解决方案)不同,EMO方法试图找到一组收敛良好且分布合理的权衡解决方案。在比较两种或多种EMO方法时,很直观地需要一个以上的性能指标。尽管EMO文献中存在许多性能指标,但它们通常应用于通过EMO算法获得的最终非支配集合,以评估其性能。在本章中,我们强调需要运行性能指标,这将提供EMO算法工作的动态性。使用已知的帕累托最优前沿或世代人口聚集,两个建议的度量标准揭示了EMO工作的重要见解和有趣的动态,并有助于对两种或更多种EMO方法进行比较评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号