首页> 外文会议>Americas conference on information systems;AMCIS 2005 >A Comparison of the Risks in Information TechnologyOutsourcing and Business Process Outsourcing
【24h】

A Comparison of the Risks in Information TechnologyOutsourcing and Business Process Outsourcing

机译:信息技术外包与业务流程外包中的风险比较

获取原文

摘要

While the issue of risk in information technology outsourcing (ITO) is addressed by numerous authors, the risks of businessprocess outsourcing (BPO) are essentially unexplored. The authors propose that the risk structure of ITO is differentcompared to the one in BPO, the latter therefore requiring additional research. To challenge this proposition the major risksof ITO have been derived from literature and were assessed whether they apply differently to BPO engagements. Theassessment has been conducted via structured interviews with senior business and risk mangers of BPO service providers andBPO customers.Our findings indicate that, although the individual risk types are generally the same, they differ significantly in tendency.Fifteen individual risks were analyzed and the findings were that in BPO compared to ITO, two risks are classified to have atendency to be lower and eleven risks are classified to have a tendency to be higher. Only two risks were seen to generally bethe same in BPO as with ITO. Additionally, a risk type has been identified which was not formerly reported in outsourcing,namely the misuse of trust regarding sensitive data.
机译:尽管许多作者都解决了信息技术外包(ITO)的风险问题,但是基本上没有探索业务流程外包(BPO)的风险。作者认为,ITO的风险结构与BPO中的风险结构不同,因此后者需要进一步的研究。为了挑战这一主张,ITO的主要风险已从文献中得出,并对其是否适用于BPO业务进行了评估。通过与BPO服务提供商和BPO客户的高级业务和风险管理人员进行结构化访谈进行了评估。我们的调查结果表明,尽管单个风险类型大致相同,但趋势却存在显着差异。对15个单个风险进行了分析,发现在BPO中,与ITO相比,有两种风险的倾向性较低,而有11种风险的倾向性较高。在BPO中,通常只有两个风险与ITO相同。此外,还确定了以前未在外包中报告的风险类型,即滥用对敏感数据的信任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号