首页> 外文会议>Advances in conceptual modeling : Recent developments and new directions >Principled Pragmatism: A Guide to the Adaptation of Ideas from Philosophical Disciplines to Conceptual Modeling
【24h】

Principled Pragmatism: A Guide to the Adaptation of Ideas from Philosophical Disciplines to Conceptual Modeling

机译:有原则的实用主义:从哲学学科到概念模型的思想适应指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The synergism among the traditional disciplines of ontol ogy, epistemology, logic, and linguistics and their potential for enhancing conceptual-modeling applications is not fully understood. Better under standing how to adapt ideas from these disciplines should lead to im proved serviceability of conceptual modeling. We argue in this position paper, however, that application objectives, rather than philosophical tenets, should guide the adaptation of ideas from these disciplines. Thus, an appropriate balance of discipline-based theory and pragmatism should temper adaptations. We evaluate the principled pragmatism we advo cate by presenting several case-study examples. Each illustrates that an appropriate adaptation of ideas from the disciplines of ontology, episte mology, logic, and linguistics can significantly guide conceptual-modeling research and help build successful conceptual-modeling applications.
机译:本体论,认识论,逻辑学和语言学的传统学科之间的协同作用及其在增强概念建模应用程序方面的潜力尚未得到充分理解。更好地了解如何从这些学科中适应想法应该可以提高概念建模的可服务性。但是,我们在这份立场文件中认为,应用目标而不是哲学宗旨应指导这些学科的思想适应。因此,以学科为基础的理论与实用主义之间的适当平衡应该缓和适应。我们通过提供一些案例研究示例来评估我们崇尚的原则性实用主义。每个例子都表明,从本体论,认知论,逻辑学和语言学等学科对思想进行适当的改编可以显着指导概念建模研究并帮助构建成功的概念建模应用程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号