首页> 外文会议>Advanced Signal Processing Algorithms, Architectures, and Implementations II >Comparison of synthetic-aperture radar autofocus techniques: phase gradient versus subaperture
【24h】

Comparison of synthetic-aperture radar autofocus techniques: phase gradient versus subaperture

机译:合成孔径雷达自动聚焦技术的比较:相位梯度与子孔径

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract: Two methods of focusing synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are compared. Both a conventional subaperture cross-correlation method and a new phase gradient autofocus (PGA) algorithm developed at Sandia National Laboratories are shown to perform well if high-order phase errors are not present. With the introduction of significant high-order phase errors $LB@e.g., due to uncompensated platform motion$RB@, both algorithms suffer a loss in performance. However, relative performance degradation is less for PGA than for the subaperture focusing technique. An explanation is presented for the observed behavior of the two autofocus techniques.!8
机译:摘要:比较了两种聚焦合成孔径雷达(SAR)图像的方法。如果不存在高阶相位误差,则传统的子孔径互相关方法和桑迪亚国家实验室开发的新的相位梯度自动聚焦(PGA)算法均显示出良好的性能。由于引入了明显的高阶相位误差$ LB @,例如,由于平台运动的未补偿$ RB @,两种算法的性能都受到损失。但是,与子孔径聚焦技术相比,PGA的相对性能下降较小。给出了两种自动对焦技术观察到的行为的解释。!8

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号