首页> 外文会议>2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Technologies Results >A Critical Review of 'A Practical Guide to Select Quality Indicators for Assessing Pareto-Based Search Algorithms in Search-Based Software Engineering': Essay on Quality Indicator Selection for SBSE
【24h】

A Critical Review of 'A Practical Guide to Select Quality Indicators for Assessing Pareto-Based Search Algorithms in Search-Based Software Engineering': Essay on Quality Indicator Selection for SBSE

机译:对“在基于搜索的软件工程中选择用于评估基于Pareto的搜索算法的质量指标的实用指南”的评论:SBSE质量指标选择随笔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents a critical review of the work published at ICSE'2016 on a practical guide of quality indicator selection for assessing multiobjective solution sets in search-based software engineering (SBSE). This review has two goals. First, we aim at explaining why we disagree with the work at ICSE'2016 and why the reasons behind this disagreement are important to the SBSE community. Second, we aim at providing a more clarified guide of quality indicator selection, serving as a new direction on this particular topic for the SBSE community. In particular, we argue that it does matter which quality indicator to select, whatever in the same quality category or across different categories. This claim is based upon the fundamental goal of multiobjective optimisation — supplying the decision-maker a set of solutions which are the most consistent with their preferences.
机译:本文对在ICSE'2016上发表的工作进行了严格的审查,该工作涉及质量指标选择的实用指南,用于评估基于搜索的软件工程(SBSE)中的多目标解决方案集。这次审查有两个目标。首先,我们的目的是解释为什么我们不同意ICSE'2016的工作,以及为什么产生这种异议的原因对SBSE社区很重要。其次,我们旨在为质量指标选择提供更明确的指南,为SBSE社区在此特定主题上提供新的指导。特别是,我们认为选择相同质量类别或不同类别的质量指标确实很重要。此主张基于多目标优化的基本目标-为决策者提供最符合其偏好的解决方案集。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号