首页> 外文会议>2008 China international conference in finance >Foreign Institutional Ownership and Stock Market Liquidity: Evidence from Indonesia
【24h】

Foreign Institutional Ownership and Stock Market Liquidity: Evidence from Indonesia

机译:外国机构所有权和股票市场流动性:来自印度尼西亚的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

From January 2002 to August 2007, foreign institutions held almost 70% of the free-float value of the Indonesian equity market, or 41% of the total market capitalization. Over the same period, liquidity on the Jakarta Stock Exchange improved substantially with spread more than halved and depth more than doubled. Was the high foreign institutional ownership a major contributing factor to the improvement? In this study we examine the Granger causality between foreign institutional ownership and liquidity. The direct and indirect effects of foreign institutions on liquidity measures are estimated using monthly Fama-McBeth regressions. We find that foreign preference for liquidity, though statistically significant, is economically small. However, their holdings have a large negative impact on future liquidity: a 10% increase in foreign institutional ownership in the current month is associated with approximately 2% increase in the bid-ask spread, 3% decrease in depth, and 4% rise in price sensitivity in the next month. The negative effects of foreign institutions are mostly in the first half of the sample period. The liquidity effects of domestic institutions are mixed but more positive. The findings are consistent with the negative liquidity impact of institutional investors in developed markets, and challenge the view that foreign institutions enhance the liquidity in small emerging markets.
机译:从2002年1月到2007年8月,外国机构持有印尼股票市场自由流通价值的近70%,或总市值的41%。同期,雅加达证券交易所的流动性大大改善,利差扩大了一半以上,深度增加了一倍以上。外国机构拥有较高的所有权是否是改善的主要因素?在这项研究中,我们研究了外国机构所有权和流动性之间的格兰杰因果关系。外国机构对流动性衡量指标的直接和间接影响是使用每月Fama-McBeth回归进行估算的。我们发现,外国人对流动性的偏好,尽管在统计上意义重大,但在经济上却很小。但是,它们的持有量对未来的流动性产生了很大的负面影响:本月外国机构持股量增加10%,买卖价差增加约2%,深度减少3%,而买入价上涨4%。下个月的价格敏感性。外国机构的负面影响主要发生在样本期的上半年。国内机构的流动性影响参差不齐,但更为积极。这些发现与机构投资者在发达市场中对流动性的负面影响是一致的,并且挑战了外国机构增强小型新兴市场中流动性的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号