首页> 外文会议>15th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory Jul 16-18, 2002 Adelaide, Australia >ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING THE PROBIT PATH-BASED STOCHASTIC USER EQUILIBRIUM TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM WITH ONE OR MORE USER CLASSES
【24h】

ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING THE PROBIT PATH-BASED STOCHASTIC USER EQUILIBRIUM TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM WITH ONE OR MORE USER CLASSES

机译:一种或多种用户类别的基于概率路径的随机用户均衡交通分配问题的算法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The paper has considered different analytical approximation methods for the solution of the probit choice function and addressed their application for the calculation of the path-based Stochastic User Equilibrium traffic pattern with one or more user classes. The approximations of Clark (1961), Mendell-Elston (1974), Langdon (1984a, b), Tang and Melchers (1987) have been reviewed and their accuracy and computational cost assessed in two series of numerical experiments in which the choice probabilities obtained with each method were compared with those calculated with the numerical integration method of Genz (1992). The results of the experiments show the tendency to produce large percentage errors for low choice probabilities of the two possible implementations of the method of Clark (although at a smaller scale for the improved Clark method), the good accuracy of the Langdon method and the very good accuracy of the methods of Tang and Melchers and of Mendell and Elston. The Mendell and Elston approximation offers the best trade-off between accuracy and calculation time for different numbers of options. Therefore it seems particularly suitable for applications where the choice calculations need be performed a large number of times as in traffic assignment. In general the experiments proved that the analytical approach to solving the probit choice function is feasible and accurate. The numerical integration method, here used only to provide an accurate comparator, constitutes also a precise, although more time consuming, alternative to the use of approximations. The application of the analytical approximation methods to solve the probit path-based SUE traffic assignment problem using the objective function of Sheffi and Powell (1982) has been investigated exploring the performance of different solution algorithms in cases with paths enumerated before the assignment. Path-based implementations of the optimisation algorithms proposed by Maher and Hughes (1997) have been found to be much more efficient then the traditional MSA, consistent with the result of Maher and Hughes. A heuristic to obtain the value of the satisfaction for use in the optimisation algorithms for the approximations that do not calculate it directly has been proposed. False position and rational function interpolation methods to estimate the optimal step length have been proposed and found to be more efficient than the MSA and typically as efficient as the methods proposed by Maher and Hughes (1997).
机译:本文针对概率选择函数的解决方案考虑了不同的解析逼近方法,并讨论了它们在计算具有一个或多个用户类别的基于路径的随机用户均衡流量模式中的应用。回顾了Clark(1961),Mendell-Elston(1974),Langdon(1984a,b),Tang和Melchers(1987)的近似值,并在两个数值实验中评估了它们的准确性和计算成本,从中得出了选择概率将每种方法与用Genz(1992)的数值积分方法计算出的方法进行比较。实验结果表明,对于克拉克方法的两种可能实施方式的选择概率较低,倾向于产生较大百分比误差的趋势(尽管对于改进的克拉克方法而言规模较小),兰登方法的精度很高,并且Tang和Melchers以及Mendell和Elston的方法具有很高的准确性。对于不同数量的选项,Mendell和Elston近似值在精度和计算时间之间提供了最佳平衡。因此,它似乎特别适合于像交通分配一样需要多次执行选择计算的应用。总体而言,实验证明,求解概率选择函数的分析方法是可行且准确的。数值积分方法在这里仅用于提供一个精确的比较器,它也构成了一种精确的替代方法,尽管耗时较多,但可以替代近似法。利用Sheffi和Powell(1982)的目标函数,研究了解析近似方法在解决基于概率路径的SUE交通分配问题中的应用,探索了在分配前列举路径的情况下不同解决方案算法的性能。由Maher和Hughes(1997)提出的基于路径的优化算法实现比传统的MSA效率更高,这与Maher和Hughes的结果一致。已经提出了一种启发式算法,用于获得不直接计算其近似值的优化算法所用的满意度值。提出了估计最佳步长的错误位置和有理函数插值方法,发现它们比MSA更有效,并且通常与Maher和Hughes(1997)提出的方法一样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号