首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison between two different pretreatment technologies of rice straw fibers prior to fiberboard manufacturing: Twin-screw extrusion and digestion plus defibration
【2h】

Comparison between two different pretreatment technologies of rice straw fibers prior to fiberboard manufacturing: Twin-screw extrusion and digestion plus defibration

机译:纤维板制造之前两种不同的稻草纤维预处理技术的比较:双螺杆挤压和消化加解纤

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present work compares two different pretreatment technologies, i.e. twin-screw extrusion, and steaming digestion plus defibration, for producing a thermo-mechanical pulp from rice straw for fiberboard manufacturing. Five liquid/solid ratios from 0.43 to 1.02 were tested for twin-screw extrusion pretreatment, while liquid/solid ratios from 4 to 6 were used for digestion pretreatment. Energy consumption, and characteristics of the extrudates (twin-screw extrusion) and pulps (digestion) (including fiber morphology, chemical composition, thermal properties, apparent and tapped densities, as well as color) were the analyzed parameters for the resulting lignocellulosic fibers. The results showed that liquid/solid ratio had influence on energy consumption of the equipment for both defibrating methods For the twin-screw extrusion method, a lower liquid/solid ratio required more energy while for the digestion plus defibration the effect was the opposite. The corresponding total specific energy consumption ranged from 0.668 kW h/kg to 0.946 kW h/kg dry matter for twin-screw extrusion, and from 6.176 kW h/kg to 8.52 kW h/kg dry matter for digestion plus defibration. Thus, the pulping method consumed about nine times more energy than that of the twin-screw extrusion. In addition, for twin-screw extrusion, the liquid/solid ratio did not have a substantial effect on fiber characteristics with similar chemical compositions and thermal properties. For twin-screw extrusion, the energy consumption was 37% reduced when the liquid/solid ratio was increased from 0.43 to 1.02. Instead, for digestion plus defibration, the energy increase was 38% when the liquid/solid ratio increased from 4 to 6.
机译:本工作比较了两种不同的预处理技术,即双螺杆挤出,蒸煮消解和去纤维化技术,该技术用于从稻草生产纤维板制造用的热机械浆。对双螺杆挤压预处理测试了5种液/固比(从0.43至1.02),而液/固比(从4至6)用于消化预处理。能耗,挤出物(双螺杆挤出)和纸浆的特性(消化)(包括纤维形态,化学成分,热性能,表观和堆积密度以及颜色)是所得木质纤维素纤维的分析参数。结果表明,两种去纤方法的液/固比都对设备的能耗有影响。对于双螺杆挤出法,较低的液/固比需要更多的能量,而对于消化加解纤则效果相反。对于双螺杆挤出,相应的总比能耗为0.668 kW h / kg干物质至0.946 kW h / kg干物质,用于消化和解纤的干物质为6.176 kW h / kg至8.52 kW h / kg干物质。因此,制浆方法消耗的能量是双螺杆挤出法的九倍。此外,对于双螺杆挤出,液/固比对具有相似化学组成和热性能的纤维特性没有实质性影响。对于双螺杆挤出,当液/固比从0.43增加到1.02时,能耗降低了37%。相反,对于消化加解纤,当液/固比从4增加到6时,能量增加38%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号