Mainstream participation as an institution: commentary on 'Legitimacy and ambiguity: institutional logics and their outcome for people with intellectual disabilities' (Ineland, 2020)

摘要

Ineland's (2020) article has offered an original and productive framework to understand and navigate the challenges of mainstream participation by people with intellectual disabilities. The article frames these challenges as arising from incompatibilities between the dominant institutional logics of mainstream programs and those that underpin disability support services.