...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of diagnostic sensitivities of three assays (Bartels enzyme immunoassay (EIA), Biotest EIA, and Binax NOW immunochromatographic test) for detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in urine.
【24h】

Comparison of diagnostic sensitivities of three assays (Bartels enzyme immunoassay (EIA), Biotest EIA, and Binax NOW immunochromatographic test) for detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in urine.

机译:比较三种检测方法(Bartels 酶免疫分析 (EIA)、Biotest EIA 和 Binax NOW 免疫层析试验)检测尿液中嗜肺军团菌血清群 1 抗原的诊断敏感性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Bartels enzyme immunoassay (EIA), Biotest EIA, and Binax NOW immunochromatographic test (ICT) urinary antigen kits for the detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 were compared using 178 frozen urine samples. When nonconcentrated urine samples were used, the sensitivity levels of both enzyme EIAs were significantly higher than the sensitivity level of the ICT (Bartels EIA, 71.3; Biotest EIA, 65.1; Binax NOW ICT, 37 P < 0.001). After concentration of the urine samples, no significant differences in sensitivity were found among the three tests.
机译:使用 178 份冷冻尿液样本比较了用于检测嗜肺军团菌血清群 1 的 Bartels 酶免疫测定 (EIA)、Biotest EIA 和 Binax NOW 免疫层析检测 (ICT) 尿抗原试剂盒。当使用非浓缩尿液样本时,两种酶EIA的敏感性水平都显著高于ICT的敏感性水平(Bartels EIA,71.3%;生物测试EIA,65.1%;Binax NOW ICT,37% [P < 0.001])。对尿液样本进行浓缩后,三项测试在敏感性方面没有发现显著差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号