...
首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science policy & management >Proficiency Testing Trends Following the 2009 National Academy of Sciences Report, 'Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward'
【24h】

Proficiency Testing Trends Following the 2009 National Academy of Sciences Report, 'Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward'

机译:2009 年美国国家科学院报告《加强美国法医学:前进之路》之后的能力验证趋势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The 2009 NAS Report made several recommendations, among which was a call for increased accreditation of forensic laboratories and certification of forensic scientists. Proficiency testing, a key quality measure for both accreditation and certification, was also cited in the Report as being mandatory to achieve and maintain these quality indicators. Data from a proficiency test provider was analyzed from the period of 2008-2015 to examine if laboratories were increasing proficiency testing by examining enrollment numbers and the return rate of the completed proficiency tests. Noting a key difference in domestic and international laboratories, additional data from the period of 2004-2015 was analyzed to examine the return rate of proficiency tests against the percentage of reports released to accreditation bodies. The entirety of the data was reviewed to see if the 2009 NAS Report's recommendations were being enacted by looking for an increasing number of accredited laboratories enrolling in proficiency tests, returning the test results, and reporting the proficiency testing outcomes to accrediting bodies in the period following 2009-2010. Despite the recommendations put forward by the National Academies for increased accreditation, certification, and as a result, proficiency testing, the current data from proficiency test enrollment and return rate does not show a marked increase in proficiency testing in U.S.-based forensic laboratories, but does reflect an increase in the ratio of proficiency test results submitted to support accreditation for the laboratories.
机译:2009年NAS报告提出了几项建议,其中包括呼吁增加对法医实验室的认证和对法医科学家的认证。能力验证是认可和认证的关键质量衡量标准,报告还指出,能力验证是实现和维持这些质量指标的强制性要求。分析了 2008-2015 年期间能力测试提供者的数据,以检查实验室是否通过检查注册人数和已完成能力测试的返回率来增加能力验证。注意到国内和国际实验室的一个关键差异,分析了2004-2015年期间的额外数据,以检查能力测试的返回率与向认证机构发布的报告的百分比。在2009-2010年期间,通过寻找越来越多的认可实验室参加能力验证,返回测试结果,并向认证机构报告能力验证结果,审查了2009年NAS报告的建议,以确定2009年NAS报告的建议是否正在实施。尽管美国国家科学院提出了增加认证、认证以及能力测试的建议,但目前的能力测试注册和返回率数据并未显示美国能力测试的显着增加。基于法医实验室,但确实反映了为支持实验室认证而提交的能力测试结果比例的增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号