...
首页> 外文期刊>Occupational therapy in health care >The Entry-Level Occupational Therapy Clinical Doctorate: Advantages, Challenges, and International Issues to Consider
【24h】

The Entry-Level Occupational Therapy Clinical Doctorate: Advantages, Challenges, and International Issues to Consider

机译:入门级职业治疗临床博士学位:优势、挑战和需要考虑的国际问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Internationally, occupational therapy education has gone through several paradigm shifts during the last few decades, moving from certificate to diploma to bachelors to masters and now in some instances to clinical doctorate as the entry-level professional credential to practice. In the United States there is a recommendation under consideration by the American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) that by 2025, all occupational therapy university programs will move to the clinical doctorate level. It should be noted, however, that the AOTA Board can only make recommendations and it is the Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education (ACOTE) who has regulatory authority to approve such a change. What are the potential implications for the profession, our clients, and funders of occupational therapy services? What are the primary drivers for the move towards the clinical doctorate being the educational entry point? Is the next step in the evolution of occupational therapy education globally a shift to the entry-level clinical doctorate? This article reviews current literature and discusses issues about the occupational therapy entry-level clinical doctorate. The published evidence available about the occupational therapy entry-level clinical doctorate is summarized and the perceived or frequently cited pros and cons of moving to the clinical doctorate as the singular entry point to occupational therapy practice are considered. The potential impacts of the introduction of the clinical doctorate as the entry-to-practice qualification across the United States on the occupational therapy community internationally will be briefly discussed. If the United States moves toward the entry-level clinical doctorate as the only educational starting point for the profession, will other jurisdictions follow suit? Further discourse and investigation of this issue both inside and outside of the United States is needed so that informed decisions can be made.
机译:在国际上,职业治疗教育在过去几十年中经历了几次范式转变,从证书到文凭,从学士到硕士,现在在某些情况下,临床博士学位作为入门级专业证书。在美国,美国职业治疗协会 (AOTA) 正在考虑一项建议,即到 2025 年,所有职业治疗大学课程都将升至临床博士学位水平。然而,应该注意的是,AOTA 委员会只能提出建议,并且只有职业治疗教育认证委员会 (ACOTE) 有权批准此类更改。对职业治疗服务的专业、我们的客户和资助者有什么潜在影响?将临床博士学位作为教育切入点的主要驱动力是什么?全球职业治疗教育发展的下一步是向入门级临床博士学位的转变吗?本文回顾了当前的文献,并讨论了有关职业治疗入门级临床博士学位的问题。总结了关于职业治疗入门级临床博士学位的已发表证据,并考虑了将临床博士学位作为职业治疗实践的唯一切入点的感知或经常引用的利弊。将简要讨论在美国各地引入临床博士学位作为执业资格对国际职业治疗界的潜在影响。如果美国将入门级临床博士学位作为该行业的唯一教育起点,其他司法管辖区会效仿吗?需要在美国国内外对这个问题进行进一步的讨论和调查,以便做出明智的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号