...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Quantum Chemistry >A new version of the multireference averaged coupled-pair functional (MR-ACPF-2)
【24h】

A new version of the multireference averaged coupled-pair functional (MR-ACPF-2)

机译:新版本的多参考平均耦合对函数(MR-ACPF-2)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The averaged coupled-pair functional (ACPF), as found in R. J. Gdanitz and R. Ahlrichs, Chem. Phys. Lett. 143 (1988), is probably the most successful method to approximate full configuration interaction (CI) on the multireference (MR) level of theory. However, ACPF has a tendency to slightly overestimate the effect of higher than double substitutions, which, when the zeroth-order wavefunction is of poor quality, may deteriorate the accuracy or even create instabilities. Since the properties of the ACPF and similar methods have apparently not always been correctly described in the literature, we repeat the derivation of this method in some detail. We analyze the connection between the (original) ACPF and the similar averaged quadratic coupled cluster (AQCC) method (which may be regarded as a damped ACPF), on one hand, and the different versions (0-3) of the coupled electron-pair approximation (CEPA), on the other hand. We find that ACPF and AQCC may be regarded as CEPA-1, respectively, CEPA-3, where the shifts of the Hamiltonian are substituted by a single averaged shift As CEPA-3 considerably underestimates correlation effects, AQCC shows the same behavior. However, when the zeroth-order wavefunction is of poor quality AQCC may be more stable and thus more accurate than ACPF By analyzing the role of the single substitutions, we find that ACPF may especially overestimate their contribution to unlinked clusters like 1/2 (T) over cap (2)(1). We therefore propose a new version, called ACPF-2, where (in contrast to AQCC) only the renormalization. factor, g, that corresponds to the singles, is damped; i.e., we have (4/N)[1 - 1/(2N - 2)]. In the limit of a large number of electrons, N, this, factor becomes two times as large as in the (original) ACPF, where 2/N is used. In order to test the new ACPF-2 method, we perform numerous comparisons with full CI, as well as calculations including terms that are linear in the interelectronic distances, r(ij). We find that in difficult cases, ACPF-2 is of similar stability as is AQCC and is thus considerably more accurate. [References: 84]
机译:如R.J.Gdanitz和R.Ahlrichs,Chem.Sci。,1998,所发现的平均偶合对官能团(ACPF)。物理来吧143(1988),可能是在多参考(MR)理论水平上近似完全配置相互作用(CI)的最成功方法。但是,ACPF倾向于稍微高估高于双重替换的效果,当零阶波函数的质量较差时,ACPF可能会降低精度甚至产生不稳定性。由于ACPF的特性和类似方法显然在文献中并未始终得到正确描述,因此我们在某种程度上重复了此方法的推导。我们一方面分析(原始)ACPF和类似的平均二次耦合簇(AQCC)方法(可能被视为阻尼ACPF)之间的联系,以及耦合电子的不同版本(0-3)另一方面,对近似(CEPA)。我们发现ACPF和AQCC可以分别视为CEPA-1,CEPA-3,其中哈密顿量的偏移被单个平均偏移所替代。由于CEPA-3大大低估了相关效应,因此AQCC表现出相同的行为。但是,当零阶波函数质量较差时,AQCC可能比ACPF更稳定,因此更准确。通过分析单个替代的作用,我们发现ACPF可能特别高估了它们对未链接簇的贡献,例如1/2(T )超出上限(2)(1)。因此,我们提出了一个称为ACPF-2的新版本,其中(与AQCC相比)仅重新规范化。对应于单项的系数g被阻尼;即,我们有(4 / N)[1-1 /(2N-2)]。在大量电子N的限制下,该系数变为(原始)ACPF(使用2 / N)的两倍。为了测试新的ACPF-2方法,我们使用完全CI进行了大量比较,并进行了计算,其中包括在电子间距离r(ij)中呈线性的项。我们发现,在困难的情况下,ACPF-2的稳定性与AQCC相似,因此准确性更高。 [参考:84]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号