...
首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science policy & management >Addressing Fragmentation in the Forensic Document Examination Community: Applying the NAS Report's Call for Standardization to the Current State of the Field
【24h】

Addressing Fragmentation in the Forensic Document Examination Community: Applying the NAS Report's Call for Standardization to the Current State of the Field

机译:解决取证文件检查界的碎片化问题:将 NAS 报告对标准化的呼吁应用于该领域的当前状态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) released their report, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward in 2009. The NAS Committee evaluated the forensic science community at large, and reviewed specific forensic science sub-specialties and identified issues within these disciplines that needed to be addressed. One important finding was that fragmentation existed throughout the forensic sciences. More specifically, it found that the forensic science disciplines exhibit wide variability in certification, educational programs, training, and standards. The NAS Committee recommended that the field of Forensic Document Examination should develop education and training standards for forensic document examiners (FDEs) that include an academic focus. However, for all the document examiners to have an opportunity to participate in the process, the education and training standards must be outlined in a way that does not exclude or make it impossible for some people to meet the minimum education and training requirements. The purpose of this study was to analyze the content of forensic document examiners' CVs or resumes, in order to understand their background and experience, which is the first step towards developing education and training standards for FDEs. By identifying its members, assessing their training and education, and evaluating how they are using their skills, the FDE community could build upon areas of strength while also establishing guidelines aimed at rectifying its weaknesses in a fair and effective manner.
机译:美国国家科学院(NAS)国家研究委员会(National Research Council of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences,NAS)于2009年发布了他们的报告《加强美国的法医学:前进的道路》(Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward Forward)。NAS委员会评估了整个法医学界,并审查了具体的法医学亚专业,并确定了这些学科中需要解决的问题。一个重要的发现是,整个法医学都存在碎片化。更具体地说,它发现法医学学科在认证、教育计划、培训和标准方面表现出很大的差异。NAS委员会建议,法医文件审查领域应为法医文件审查员(FDE)制定教育和培训标准,其中包括学术重点。但是,要使所有文件审查员都有机会参与这一过程,教育和培训标准的概述必须不排除或使某些人无法满足最低教育和培训要求。本研究的目的是分析法医文件审查员的简历或简历的内容,以了解他们的背景和经验,这是制定 FDE 教育和培训标准的第一步。通过确定其成员,评估他们的培训和教育,并评估他们如何使用他们的技能,FDE社区可以在优势领域的基础上再接再厉,同时制定旨在以公平有效的方式纠正其弱点的指导方针。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号