...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand >Conservation pest control with new technologies: public perceptions
【24h】

Conservation pest control with new technologies: public perceptions

机译:利用新技术保护性害虫防治:公众认知

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

New genetic tools can potentially mitigate the decline of biodiversity. Democratisation of science mandates public opinion be considered while new technologies are in development. We conducted eleven focus groups in New Zealand to explore three questions about novel technologies (gene drive and two others for comparison of pest control tools): (1) what are the risks/benefits? (2) how do they compare to current methods? and (3) who should be represented on a panel that evaluates the tools and what factors should they consider? Findings from the content analysis of the risks/benefits revealed three main considerations that were of social concern - Environmental, Practical, and Ethical. Most participants were self-aware of their insufficient knowledge to compare the different technologies. Unanimously, respondents wanted the available information provided throughout the tool development process and saw multi-sector panel oversight as essential. Scientists and policy makers should match the public's willingness to engage collaboratively.
机译:新的遗传工具可以潜在地缓解生物多样性的下降。科学的民主化要求在新技术开发的同时考虑公众舆论。我们在新西兰进行了 11 个焦点小组,探讨了有关新技术的三个问题(基因驱动和另外两个用于比较害虫防治工具的问题):(1) 风险/益处是什么?(2)它们与当前方法相比如何?(3)评估工具的小组中应该有谁代表,他们应该考虑哪些因素?风险/收益的内容分析结果揭示了社会关注的三个主要考虑因素——环境、实用和道德。大多数参与者都意识到他们没有足够的知识来比较不同的技术。答复者一致希望在整个工具开发过程中提供可用信息,并认为多部门小组监督至关重要。科学家和政策制定者应该与公众合作的意愿相匹配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号