...
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of cardiology. >Risk Scores for Clinical Risk Stratification of Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain but No Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Risk Scores for Clinical Risk Stratification of Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain but No Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review

机译:急诊科有胸痛但无急性心肌梗死患者临床风险分层的风险评分:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

? 2023 The AuthorsBackground: Chest pain is a common cause for emergency department (ED) presentations. After myocardial infarction (MI) has been ruled out by means of electrocardiography and troponin testing, decisions around anatomic or functional testing may be informed by clinical risk scores. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize evidence of the prognostic performance of chest pain risk scores among ED patients who have had MI ruled out by means of a high-sensitivity troponin assay. Methods: We queried multiple databases from inception to May 17, 2022. We included studies that quantified risk of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), at different cutoffs of clinical risk scores, among adult patients who had MI ruled out by means of a high-sensitivity troponin assay. Prognostic performance of each score was synthesized and described, but meta-analysis was not possible. Results: Six studies met inclusion criteria. Short-term MACE risk among patients who had MI ruled out by means of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays was very low. The HEART score, with a cutoff of 3 or less, predicted a very low risk of MACE among the greatest proportion of patients. Other scores had lower sensitivity or classified fewer patients as low risk. Conclusions: The HEART score with a cutoff value of 3 or less accurately identified the greatest number of patients at low risk of 30-day MACE. However, MACE risk among patients who have MI ruled out by means of high-sensitivity troponin testing is sufficiently low that clinical risk stratification or noninvasive testing may be of little additional value in identifying patients with coronary disease.
机译:?2023 作者背景:胸痛是急诊科 (ED) 就诊的常见原因。在通过心电图和肌钙蛋白检测排除心肌梗死 (MI) 后,临床风险评分可能会为解剖学或功能检测的决策提供依据。我们进行了一项系统评价,以综合通过高敏肌钙蛋白测定排除心肌梗死的ED患者胸痛风险评分预后性能的证据。方法:我们查询了建库至2022年5月17日的多个数据库。我们纳入了通过高敏肌钙蛋白测定排除心肌梗死的成年患者中,在临床风险评分的不同临界值下量化30天主要不良心脏事件(major adverse cardiac events, MACE)风险的研究。综合并描述了每个评分的预后表现,但无法进行meta分析。结果:6项研究符合纳入标准。通过高敏心肌肌钙蛋白测定排除心肌梗死的患者的短期 MACE 风险非常低。HEART 评分(临界值为 3 分或更低)预测最大比例的患者发生 MACE 的风险非常低。其他评分的敏感性较低或将较少的患者归类为低风险。结论:临界值为 3 或更低的 HEART 评分准确识别了 30 天 MACE 低风险患者的最大数量。然而,通过高敏肌钙蛋白检测排除心肌梗死的患者的 MACE 风险非常低,临床风险分层或无创检测在识别冠状动脉疾病患者方面可能几乎没有额外价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号