...
首页> 外文期刊>Group dynamics: theory, research, and practice >The Rhythm of Teamwork: Discovering a Complex Temporal Pattern of Team Processes
【24h】

The Rhythm of Teamwork: Discovering a Complex Temporal Pattern of Team Processes

机译:团队合作的节奏:发现团队过程的复杂时间模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The recurring phase model of team processes suggests the existence of a rhythm of team task accomplishment, which refers to a repeated sequence of transition and action phases over time. Drawing on this model, we provide the first empirical investigation of whether different types of teamwork rhythm emerge, whether the rhythm varies according to the type of task, and whether the rhythm is related to team performance. Method: We observed and videoed student teams (N = 48) working on two different tasks (a creative task and a construction task) in a laboratory setting. Team processes were coded and assigned to transition or action phases using a custom algorithm. The rhythm of teamwork for each team was determined using the four parameters of tempo, regularity of tempo, focus (transition vs. action), and variability of focus. Results: Latent profile analysis revealed three distinct rhythms of teamwork across both tasks: a slow and action-oriented rhythm, a fast and regular rhythm, and a changing-focus rhythm. The results also show that the majority of the teams (63.04) changed rhythm type between the tasks. Moreover, for the creative task, a changing-focus rhythm was predictive of lower performance (g = 0.25-0.48), whereas for the construction task, no association was found between rhythm and performance. Conclusions: The study provides a methodological procedure for analyzing the rhythm of teamwork and offers some initial insights into the types of teamwork rhythms and their association with type of tasks and levels of performance.
机译:目标:团队的反复出现的阶段模型流程说明节奏的存在是指一个团队任务的成就重复序列的过渡和行动阶段随着时间的推移。第一次的实证调查不同类型的团队合作节奏出现,节奏是否根据不同类型任务,是否与节奏团队绩效。学生团队(N = 48)在两个不同的工作任务(一个创造性的任务和建设任务)在实验室设置。编码和分配给过渡或动作阶段使用自定义算法。对于每个团队决定使用四个参数的节奏,节奏的规律性,焦点(过渡和行动),和可变性的焦点。团队合作的三个不同的节奏任务:慢和行动导向的节奏,快和有规律的节奏,改变焦点的节奏。结果还表明,大部分的团队之间的节奏类型(63.04%)改变任务。改变焦点的节奏是较低的预测性能(g = 0.25 - -0.48),而为建设任务,没有发现协会节奏和性能之间的关系。研究提供了方法论的过程分析团队合作和提供了一些的节奏最初的洞察团队合作的类型节奏和他们联系类型的任务和水平的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号